2012 Ninth International Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/jcsse.2012.6261963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Undercovering research trends: Network analysis of keywords in scholarly articles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar study for the field of Marketing Science which relies on the usage of keyword counts can be found at [81]. A. Duvvuru et al [82] conducted a keyword based study for the European Journal of Operational Research. They suggested a network analysis technique for the keywords in scholarly articles.…”
Section: ) Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar study for the field of Marketing Science which relies on the usage of keyword counts can be found at [81]. A. Duvvuru et al [82] conducted a keyword based study for the European Journal of Operational Research. They suggested a network analysis technique for the keywords in scholarly articles.…”
Section: ) Frequency Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duvvuru et al [3,17] analysed networks of co-occurring keywords in scholarly articles and monitored the evolution in time of the link weights for detecting research trends and emerging research areas. However, as pointed out by previous works [18], keywords tend to be noisy and do not always represent research topics.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already several approaches capable of detecting novel topics and research trends [2][3][4], which rely on statistical techniques to analyse the impact of either labels or distributions of words associated to topics. However, all these approaches are able to recognise topics only in the two aforementioned phases; that is, when they are already established and associated with a substantial number of publications and when the communities of researchers have already reached a consensus for a label.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods, such as the manual exploration of publications in significant conferences and journals, are no longer viable. This has led to the emergence of several approaches capable of detecting novel topics and research trends (Bolelli, Ertekin & Giles, 2009;Duvvuru, Kamarthi & Sultornsanee, 2012;He et al, 2009;Wu, Venkatramanan & Chiu, 2016). However, all of these approaches focus on topics that are already associated with a number of publications and consistently referred to by a community of researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%