2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unifying the validation of ambient solar wind models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we compared measurements and model solutions by estimating the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC). The NRMSE represents the normal- ized mean squared difference between measurements and models and facilitates comparing models with different scales [36], while the PCC measures linear correlation between two data sets. These two statistical measures are defined as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we compared measurements and model solutions by estimating the Normalized Root Mean Square Error (NRMSE) and the Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC). The NRMSE represents the normal- ized mean squared difference between measurements and models and facilitates comparing models with different scales [36], while the PCC measures linear correlation between two data sets. These two statistical measures are defined as follows:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jian et al (2011) reported that SIR timing predictions can have temporal offsets of up to 2 days at 1 AU and up to 4 days at 5 AU. Large-scale efforts dedicated to benchmarking solar wind models (e.g., Reiss et al, 2022) will likely lead to improved predictions of solar wind structures (including SIRs and CMEs) and their effects at different planets. In fact, a well-constrained and well-reproduced solar wind background is of great importance for simulating solar minimum CMEs, which tend to alter their structure and orientation during propagation largely due to interactions with the steady wind (see, e.g., the May 1997 event; Cohen et al, 2010;Odstrcil et al, 2004;Titov et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While somewhat computationally expensive, these models are currently run for real time forecasts, such as at NOAA's Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC; https://www.swpc.noaa.gov) and at the UK Met Office (https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/weather/specialist-forecasts/space-weather). International efforts aimed at unifying the validation of ambient solar wind models are currently underway (e.g., Jian et al., 2015; Reiss et al., 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%