2018
DOI: 10.3386/w24587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unions and Inequality Over the Twentieth Century: New Evidence from Survey Data

Abstract: NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
149
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 203 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
3
149
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Labor unions are receiving attention on multiple fronts. While they have long been considered an important force in redistributive politics by comparative scholars (Brady & Lee, ; Moller, Huber, Stephens, Bradley, & Nielsen, ), economists have found new evidence of unionization’s mitigating effects on economic inequality (Farber et al, ). Finally, comparative scholars are also attentive to other forms of inequality (e.g., non‐monetary inequality), aligning with Piketty’s () recent suggestion that “multi‐dimensional” inequality has contributed to the political cleavages being observed throughout the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Labor unions are receiving attention on multiple fronts. While they have long been considered an important force in redistributive politics by comparative scholars (Brady & Lee, ; Moller, Huber, Stephens, Bradley, & Nielsen, ), economists have found new evidence of unionization’s mitigating effects on economic inequality (Farber et al, ). Finally, comparative scholars are also attentive to other forms of inequality (e.g., non‐monetary inequality), aligning with Piketty’s () recent suggestion that “multi‐dimensional” inequality has contributed to the political cleavages being observed throughout the world.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Interestingly, a recent working paper by Farber, Herbst, Kuzienko, and Naida () offers new evidence that unionization also has an equalizing effect on the income distribution, which will likely inspire new dialogue about the dominant explanation for economic inequality. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel analysis in this respect is Farber et al . (), who build an 80‐year long database of union membership from US public opinion polls, showing that (i) the premium of belonging to a union has been roughly constant over the period and (ii) greater union membership from low‐skill workers vis‐à‐vis high‐skill workers compresses the skill premium. Given these results, it is unsurprising then that a fall in unionization increases both the capital–labour divide and the skill premium.…”
Section: Research On Individual Drivers Of Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concurrent rise of health and income inequities suggests that structural factors—the economic, social, and political environments that drive social outcomes—have exacerbated inequities across multiple domains. One such structural factor—declining labor union density—has precipitated burgeoning income inequity . Unionism's disproportionate decline among racialized, less‐educated, and blue‐collar workers, and the well‐documented relationship between unions and wages, benefits, occupational safety, and protective policies suggests a connection with growing mortality inequities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%