2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2015.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of routine aortic valve calcium score measurement for risk stratification of aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease in patients scheduled cardiac multislice computed tomography

Abstract: ObjectivesThis study sought to investigate the clinical utility of aortic valve calcium score (AVCS) determined by using cardiac multislice computed tomography (MSCT).MethodsData of 1315 consecutive patients who underwent both conventional echocardiography and MSCT were reviewed. Degree of aortic stenosis (AS) was assessed according to mean pressure gradient (mPG) measured by echocardiography. Extent of coronary artery disease (CAD) derived by MSCT also was evaluated in 1173 patients who did not undergo prior … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AVC is closely associated with AS severity, and AVC burden measured by CT helps diagnose severe AS when Doppler parameters are inconclusive, specifically in patients with suspected low-flow, low-gradient AS. For the quantification of AVC, Agatston scoring was the most frequently used method, exhibiting good diagnostic performance for determining severe AS, having c-indexes of 0.81–0.91, sensitivities of 80–89.7%, and specificities of 77–89% ( 3 4 24 25 26 ). However, in our study, using AVC score to diagnose severe AS had a c-index of 0.778, sensitivity of 58.3%, and specificity of 97.2% in the validation set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AVC is closely associated with AS severity, and AVC burden measured by CT helps diagnose severe AS when Doppler parameters are inconclusive, specifically in patients with suspected low-flow, low-gradient AS. For the quantification of AVC, Agatston scoring was the most frequently used method, exhibiting good diagnostic performance for determining severe AS, having c-indexes of 0.81–0.91, sensitivities of 80–89.7%, and specificities of 77–89% ( 3 4 24 25 26 ). However, in our study, using AVC score to diagnose severe AS had a c-index of 0.778, sensitivity of 58.3%, and specificity of 97.2% in the validation set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of AVC score on CT used different cutoff values for the calculated scores ( 3 4 24 25 26 ). Some studies suggested sex-specific cutoff values (≥ 1200 Agatston score for women and ≥ 2000 Agatston score for men) for diagnosing severe AS, and the current guideline accepted these cutoff values ( 4 6 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AVCS area of interest comprised the sinotubular junction (STJ), valve cusp, aortic annulus, and left ventricle outflow tract. The start of acquisition was placed from the bottom of the valve to the level of the STJ (18). The specific scanning parameters and contrast medium administration of CT are described in the supplementary material.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronary artery calcific disease and the aortic calcification score are other independent risk factors for mortality and morbidity, such as MACCE [Ozturk 2016;Rencuzogullari 2018;Raggi 2000]. However, the relationship between SS and CAC score and aortic stiffness has been reported in a limited number of case series [Budoff 2002;Shimizu 2015].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%