2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-centered design of quality of life reports for clinical care of patients with prostate cancer

Abstract: Background Primary treatment of localized prostate cancer can result in bothersome urinary, sexual, and bowel symptoms. Yet clinical application of health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) questionnaires is rare. We employed user-centered design to develop graphic dashboards of questionnaire responses from patients with prostate cancer to facilitate clinical integration of HRQOL measurement. Methods We interviewed 50 prostate cancer patients and 50 providers, assessed literacy with validated instruments (Rapid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
67
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
2
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning design, the majority of the studies was observational and cross-sectional (n= 22; 81.5%) (11,12,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(20)(21)(22)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(35)(36)(37) , and some received additional specifications: 3 were pilot studies (11.1%) (20,24,25) , 4 were multi-center studies (14.8%) (11,16,17,30) , and 5 focused on validation of assessment instruments (18.5%) (22,26,31,32,37) . Randomized clinical trials -studies that present higher levels of scientific evidence -totaled only 4 occurrences (14.8%) (19,23,33,34) , and 2 of them were multi-center studies (7.4%) (33,34) .…”
Section: Methodological and Contextual Characteristics Of The Selectementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Concerning design, the majority of the studies was observational and cross-sectional (n= 22; 81.5%) (11,12,(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(20)(21)(22)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(35)(36)(37) , and some received additional specifications: 3 were pilot studies (11.1%) (20,24,25) , 4 were multi-center studies (14.8%) (11,16,17,30) , and 5 focused on validation of assessment instruments (18.5%) (22,26,31,32,37) . Randomized clinical trials -studies that present higher levels of scientific evidence -totaled only 4 occurrences (14.8%) (19,23,33,34) , and 2 of them were multi-center studies (7.4%) (33,34) .…”
Section: Methodological and Contextual Characteristics Of The Selectementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other 2 studies (40.0%) proposed to develop new health literacy assessment instruments, both in the United States: Health LiTT (31) and METER (which includes many words from REALM) (32) . Health literacy was considered an explanatory variable in the majority of the articles (n=16, 59.3%) (11)(12)(13)16,(18)(19)(20)(23)(24)(25)(28)(29)(30)(33)(34)(35) . The articles that considered health literacy the response variable (n=11, 40.7%) (14,15,17,21,22,26,27,31,32,36,37) include the 5 instrument validation studies (18.5%) (22,26,31,32,37) , 4 population-based studies (14.8%) -2 in Taiwan (14,15) , 1 in Finland (27) and 1 intercontinental study (17) , -and 2 studies with diabetic patients (7.4%), carried out in Japan (21,36) .…”
Section: Methodological and Contextual Characteristics Of The Selectementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations