Using paired teaching for earthquake education in schools

Abstract

Abstract. In this study, we have created 10 geoscience video lessons that follow the paired-teaching pedagogical approach. This method is used to supplement the standard school curriculum with video lessons, instructed by geoscientists from around the world, coupled with activities carried out under the guidance of classroom teachers. The video lessons introduce students to the scientific concepts behind earthquakes (e.g. the Earth's interior, plate tectonics, faulting, and seismic energy), earthquake hazards, and mitigation measures (e.g. liquefaction, structural, and non-structural earthquake hazards). These concepts are taught through hands-on learning, where students use everyday materials to build models to visualize basic Earth processes that produce earthquakes and explore the effects of different hazards. To evaluate the effectiveness of these virtual lessons, we tested our videos in school classrooms in Dushanbe (Tajikistan) and London (United Kingdom). Before and after the video implementations, students completed questionnaires that probed their knowledge on topics covered by each video, including the Earth's interior, tectonic plate boundaries, and non-structural hazards. Our assessment results indicate that, while the paired-teaching video lessons appear to enhance student knowledge and understanding of some concepts (e.g. Earth's interior, earthquake location forecasting, and non-structural hazards), they bring little change to their views on the causes of earthquakes and their relation to plate boundaries. In general, the difference between UK and Tajik students' level of knowledge prior to and after video testing is more significant than the difference between pre- and post-knowledge for each group. This could be due to several factors affecting curriculum testing (e.g. level of teachers' participation and classroom culture) and students' learning of content (e.g. pre-existing hazards knowledge and experience). To maximize the impact of school-based risk reduction education, curriculum developers must move beyond innovative content and pedagogical approaches, take classroom culture into consideration, and instil skills needed for participatory learning and discovery.

Teaching climate risk for water planning: a pilot training for tertiary students and practitioners in Brazil

“…The interactive exercise in Session 1 can be used in other domains to help participants assimilate the IPCC's climate risk concept. However, that might depend on the pre-existing knowledge and experience of the participants regarding floods (Mohadjer et al, 2021). Moreover, the classroom culture must be taken into consideration in this kind of training, and adjustments may be necessary (Mohadjer et al, 2021;George et al, 2006).…”

The imaginary eruption – volcanic activity through kids' eyes

“…The mitigation of natural risk commonly involves educational campaigns aimed at disseminating correct scientific information among the exposed communities (Cardona, 1997;Borges de Amorim and Chaffe, 2021;Mohadjer et al, 2021). A clear understanding of how natural phenomena may unfold and eventually impact our lives is expected to favour the adoption of mitigation measures and cautious behaviour (Camassi et al, 2016;Meyer, 2009).…”

“…A clear understanding of how natural phenomena may unfold and eventually impact our lives is expected to favour the adoption of mitigation measures and cautious behaviour (Camassi et al, 2016;Meyer, 2009). However, the simple availability of correct information may be insufficient (Cook and Melo Zurita, 2019;Mohadjer et al, 2021). Mental models, personal experience, and emotional belief play an important role in shaping people's response to hazards (Meyer, 2009).…”

O pensamento espacial e raciocínio geográfico: Considerações teórico- metodológicas a partir da experiência brasileira

“…Por isso, antes de se aprofundar as discussões que envolvem o pensamento espacial, tenha-se como centro a definição oficial presente no prefácio do relatório do Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa dos EUA, de que o "pensamento espacial -uma forma de pensar -é baseado em um amálgama construtivo de três elementos: conceitos de espaço, ferramentas de representação e processos de raciocínio" (NRC, 2006, p. ix). Tendo em vista a definição oficial é importante que seja assinalado que ela postula, a partir dos três elementos, uma divisão que envolve a espacialidade (os conceitos espaciais presentes na configuração e nos arranjos espaciais), a visualidade (a expressão das representações gráficas), e a interpretação da espacialidade pela visualidade (os processos de raciocínio realizados pela interação do sujeito com o objeto de conhecimento), já discutido em publicações anteriores (Castellar & De Paula, 2020, 2021. (Santos, 1996).…”

“…Das abordagens intelectuais identificadas por Sinton et al, NRC o espaço é objeto a ser pensado em si mesmo para obter um diagnóstico ou realizar uma tomada de decisão específica. O espaço é repleto de atributos para que o sujeito analise elementos contidos em representações espaciais usando informações geográficas(Kuhn, 2012; Jo et al, 2016;Ridha et al, 2019;Mohadjer et al,…”