2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.105.085151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valence-bond solid to antiferromagnet transition in the two-dimensional Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model by Langevin dynamics

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is precisely the case of SU(2) symmetric Hubbard-Stratonovich transformations [54], but investigations in Appendix D show that the averaged spin-resolved phase similarly tracks the onset of the ordered regime when approaching the thermodynamic limit for the SU(2) honeycomb Hubbard model. Furthermore, other Hamiltonians, such as the spinless fermion Hubbard model in either the honeycomb [55] or square-lattice with a π-flux, which in the Majorana basis evade the sign problem [56,57], can be studied by examining the average sign of the Pfaffian of a single weight in that basis [58], similar to what we have done here [59]. In our results, the investigation of these three important models emphasizes that the sign of the determinants, interpreted as a minimal correlation function, is sufficient to assess critical properties, circumventing what is usually employed to determine scaling properties of physically motivated quantities.…”
Section: The Attractive Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is precisely the case of SU(2) symmetric Hubbard-Stratonovich transformations [54], but investigations in Appendix D show that the averaged spin-resolved phase similarly tracks the onset of the ordered regime when approaching the thermodynamic limit for the SU(2) honeycomb Hubbard model. Furthermore, other Hamiltonians, such as the spinless fermion Hubbard model in either the honeycomb [55] or square-lattice with a π-flux, which in the Majorana basis evade the sign problem [56,57], can be studied by examining the average sign of the Pfaffian of a single weight in that basis [58], similar to what we have done here [59]. In our results, the investigation of these three important models emphasizes that the sign of the determinants, interpreted as a minimal correlation function, is sufficient to assess critical properties, circumventing what is usually employed to determine scaling properties of physically motivated quantities.…”
Section: The Attractive Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the studies of the 1D SSH model have been extended to two dimensions (2D) [40][41][42][43][44][45][46] . The optical SSH model on the square lattice without or with the Hubbard interaction U has been carefully studied by the quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) method at half filling, where the negative sign problem is absent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, in one-dimensional (1D) SSH model, any nonzero EPI can induce the CBO, referred to as dimerization, 33,48,49 , as a result of the Peierls instability 1 . The effect of a finite Hubbard U has also been considered very recently [43][44][45][46] . Since U breaks the Z 2 symmetry, a positive U enhances the SDW in the spin channel while suppresses the CDW/sSC in the charge channel, providing a new avenue to explore the transition between SDW and VBS 44,50 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either strong pairing correlations between the electrons [33] result in saturation of T c or even higher values of T c (dashed line), or competing effects resulting from the Hubbard repulsion and lattice commensurability suppress T c (dotted line). In either scenario, the system eventually becomes non-superconducting at sufficiently large densities near or at half filling (unless unnested) and, depending on the value of λ, antiferromagnetism or valence-bond-solid charge order develops [34][35][36][37].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We envision a few possibilities: either pairing correlations continue to dominate and Tc saturates or grows (dashed line) or competing effects suppress Tc (dotted line). Ultimately, at or near half filling, barring superconductivity at weak λ in absence of nesting, Tc vanishes and, depending on the value of the electron-phonon coupling λ, a valence bond solid (VBS) or antiferromagnet (AFM) emerges [34][35][36][37] (gray region).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%