2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a rabbit model of neuropathy induced by immunization with gangliosides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not find a significant difference in the antibody titers to GM1 between group I rabbits and group II rabbits confirming that antiganglioside antibodies, even though at high titer, are "per se" not sufficient to cause the experimental neuropathy [14,18]. Rabbits which developed the neuropathy showed higher titers of monospecific and high-affinity anti-GM1 antibodies which were detectable even four weeks before the onset of the neuropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We did not find a significant difference in the antibody titers to GM1 between group I rabbits and group II rabbits confirming that antiganglioside antibodies, even though at high titer, are "per se" not sufficient to cause the experimental neuropathy [14,18]. Rabbits which developed the neuropathy showed higher titers of monospecific and high-affinity anti-GM1 antibodies which were detectable even four weeks before the onset of the neuropathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…High-affinity antibodies were also demonstrated in a previous study in rabbits immunized with GM1 and KLH which developed the neuropathy, but these antibodies were not searched in the unaffected rabbits immunized with the same procedure [20]. More recently it was reported that rabbits, immunized with GM1 and KLH, which developed an axonal neuropathy had highaffinity antibodies, whereas the only rabbit immunized with the same procedure, which did not developed the neuropathy did not have highaffinity antibodies [18]. In support of the importance of monospecific antibodies Lardone and co-workers found significant associations between fine specificity and disease severity also in GBS patients [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations