2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12662-018-0563-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of competition results during one season in swimming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Preparatory races of minor importance, for which athletes were not fully tapered and prepared for, may have caused results below the swimmers' current personal best times. This could explain the difference in current findings compared to previously reported lower performance variation for better athletes [9] and the peaking phase [6,8]. Additionally, conclusions drawn from mixed samples of males and females may not reflect performance variation in elite female swimmers.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Preparatory races of minor importance, for which athletes were not fully tapered and prepared for, may have caused results below the swimmers' current personal best times. This could explain the difference in current findings compared to previously reported lower performance variation for better athletes [9] and the peaking phase [6,8]. Additionally, conclusions drawn from mixed samples of males and females may not reflect performance variation in elite female swimmers.…”
Section: Plos Onecontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In previous studies, variability in competition performance decreased during the preparatory phase leading up to the seasonal main event [6,8]. While better athletes generally showed Table 3.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, Pyne et al (2004) calculated a between competition performance Years) 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Female-Short Course 50 m Backstroke 77 77 75 76 76 75 75 82 75 84 49 100 m Backstroke 71 80 83 77 82 78 75 88 75 80 71 200 m Backstroke 23 79 86 82 75 77 77 80 76 80 51 Female-Long Course 50 m Backstroke 70 82 75 80 80 79 81 75 85 81 67 100 m Backstroke 62 85 84 79 80 86 83 84 81 79 variation of 0.8%; 0.73-0.86%, with data from 51 Olympic level swimmers. Interestingly, a more recent study of 19 elite swimmers during their 8 months build up to the Rio Olympics reported variations of between ∼0.7-0.5% with greater variation for sprinters compared to middle distance swimmers and males compared to females (Clephas and Wilhelm, 2019). As evidenced above, researchers recognize the importance of quantifying competition-to-competition variability in swimming performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%