2021
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2021.3056197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational Formulation of Unsupervised Deep Learning for Ultrasound Image Artifact Removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…proposed an unsupervised deep learning approach based on an optimal transport‐driven CycleGAN network for ultrasound image artifact removal. In their model, an unsupervised learning problem was formulated as a stochastic generalization of the penalized least squares using an optimal transport theory 96 . Unsupervised CNNs have been proposed to predict time‐delay estimation between RF data in ultrasound elastography.…”
Section: Deep Learning Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…proposed an unsupervised deep learning approach based on an optimal transport‐driven CycleGAN network for ultrasound image artifact removal. In their model, an unsupervised learning problem was formulated as a stochastic generalization of the penalized least squares using an optimal transport theory 96 . Unsupervised CNNs have been proposed to predict time‐delay estimation between RF data in ultrasound elastography.…”
Section: Deep Learning Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach is particularly useful in finding meaningful patterns and groups in the dataset, and for extracting generative features. Unsupervised learning approaches in ultrasound imaging have been used for tasks such as image artifact removal, 96 and image registration and segmentation. 97 Khan et al 96 proposed an unsupervised deep learning approach based on an optimal transport-driven CycleGAN network for ultrasound image artifact removal.…”
Section: Advanced Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 2D visualization of original feature space X , the decoded-output using proposed DeepLSE X = Dec(Enc(X )), and the residual of original-input and decoded output of DeepLSE X − X in Figure 7a it can be seen that the original feature space X with 1D-PCA-GCNR score of 0.14 units, is highly overlapping/non-linear and have almost no discriminating capabilities in linear-space. Whereas, the proposed DeepLSE method which acts as optimaltransport (OT) [35,36], and shift the data distributions in such a way that the reconstruction error of the original signal remains comparable to the conventional AE as well as the classification power is greatly improved. Its feature space, shown in Figure 7b, results in 1D-PCA-GCNR score of 0.77 units, which is 0.63 units higher than the original discriminating power.…”
Section: Analysis Of Decoder and Residual Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors show that by doing this the quality of generated Images can be improved considerably. Other works such as [16] where the authors used cycleGAN to model the super resolution in ultrasound imaging by artifact removal in an unsupervised fashion. The authors [16] also mention that this work is able to tackle other similar objective works involving deconvolution, speckle removal amongst many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works such as [16] where the authors used cycleGAN to model the super resolution in ultrasound imaging by artifact removal in an unsupervised fashion. The authors [16] also mention that this work is able to tackle other similar objective works involving deconvolution, speckle removal amongst many others. There have also been self-supervised learning based approaches for super resolution keeping in mind the lack of available high resolution images in [17] and thus prove to be superior to state of the art super resolution algorithms for Ultrasound image super resolution on some datasets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%