Varying criticality of key success factors of national e-Strategy along the status of economic development of nations

Notice of Retraction: Prioritize urban e-strategy based on the group evidential reasoning approach

“…Each element describes the relative importance of one attribute over another. Then, using equation (2) to calculate the maximumλ: …”

“…This framework presented the class of criteria to assess of each stage help to gauge e-strategy performance to meet country's development goals. Yoon [2] defined 15 critical success factors of national e-Strategy and investigates the possibility of prioritizing factors by Delphi survey. Zavadskas [3] investigate the projects of "Intelligent Cities" and e-City helped to identify and describe major trends of e-cities development in industrialized countries as well as providing recommendations for e-Vilnius development.…”

The role of future-oriented technology analysis in e-Government: a systematic review

“…Various factors are described whose presence or absence determines success or failure of projects [25]. Some factors that encourage the successful implementation of eGovernment projects are understanding of the requirements for such implementation, and user involvement in the process, clarity of vision and strategy, well-defined goals, [7,9,10,[26][27][28] together with government support, and strong consumer expectations [8,29,30]. As pointed out by Gichoya [25] the absence of such conditions can mean failure or, at best, only partial success.…”

IT Governance: The Key Factor of E-Government Implementation in China

“…For the study of the key factors of the E-government implementation effectiveness, most of the literatures base on these studies, but have some differences in the study perspective. Some scholars summarized the key success factors of the E-government implementation from a more abstract overall level, for example, through systemizing the literatures about the E-government key success factors in top five journals in public management field (Public Administration Review, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, American Review of Public Administration, Administration and Society, and Public Performance and Management) from 1999 to 2003, Gil-Garcia considered that the key factors of E-government includes five categories: Information and Data, Information Technology, Organizational and Managerial, Legal and Regulatory, Institutional and Environmental [5]; Yoon analyzed many critical success factors of E-government in national level, such as ICT infrastructure, financial resources, public education, system, privacy and security, leadership, involvement of private organizations, and through statistical analysis, discussed the significant differences in the priority on the critical success factors between the developed countries, developing countries and underdeveloped countries [6].Other scholars refined the influencing of a certain factor to the E-government implementation effectiveness based on the specific situations, of them Ke summarized the key success factors that Singapore government to implement E-government through reviewing and analyzing the Singapore's E-government implementation process, including the Government's leadership, bridging the digital divide, coordination mechanisms between government departments [7];Chu adopted the empirical research methods and in-depth discussed the user factors that affect the E-government implementation effectiveness such as user action and user attitudes based on the Technology Acceptance Model and the practice of the Taiwan government's ETS(Electronic Tendering System) project [8]. Gichoya summed up a conceptual framework of the success factors and failure factors of E-government from a microcosmic view of a government department's project implementation [9]; Based on the case studies of the implementation of the E-government projects of the Taiwan's Bureau of Foreign Trade from 1998 to 2003, Tseng refined the management factors affecting the E-government implementation effectivenessfrom several views, such as strategic alliances, project implementation and design, management changing and innovation, stakeholder management, MIS development capacity [10]; Prybutok adopted empirical studies method to discuss the relationship between the leadership, quality of information and the interests of the network, explained the important role of leadership [11].…”