1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1980.tb00825.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertical Equating Using the Rasch Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
145
1
4

Year Published

1985
1985
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
5
145
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the most significant phases of test equation based on Item Response Theory is to place all parameters in a common scale (Loyd and Hoover, 1980;Kolen and Brennan, 2004). This placement process is performed when A and B curve coefficients obtained from item parameters are psychometrically transformed.…”
Section: Findings Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the most significant phases of test equation based on Item Response Theory is to place all parameters in a common scale (Loyd and Hoover, 1980;Kolen and Brennan, 2004). This placement process is performed when A and B curve coefficients obtained from item parameters are psychometrically transformed.…”
Section: Findings Discussion and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean/mean method incorporates the means of the discrimination parameters and the means of the difficulty parameters over common items to estimate the linking coefficients as follows (Loyd & Hoover, 1980):…”
Section: Mean/mean Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The item parameters for item j on Scale J are , , and ; the item parameters for item j on Scale I are , , and . Kim and Lee (2006) indicated that there are four scale linking methods which are applicable to mixed-format tests: the mean/sigma (Marco, 1977), mean/mean (Loyd & Hoover, 1980), Haebara (1980), and Stocking and Lord (1983). Mean/mean and mean/sigma methods are referred to as moment methods while the Haebara and, Stocking and Lord methods are referred to as characteristic curve methods (Kolen & Brennan, 2004).…”
Section: Irt Test Equatingmentioning
confidence: 99%