Vom Altenheim zum Seniorenservice

Schneiders, Katrin

doi:10.5771/9783845222950

Cited by 16 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Innovationsstrategien, die sich an einer qualitativen Verbesserung bestehender Angebote orientieren, treffen auf eine Welt, in der häufig eindeutige In der Altenpjlege sind seit der Einführung der Pflegeversicherung Mitte der 1990er Jahre zum Teil erhebliche Veränderungen in der Trägerstruktur erkennbar (Schneiders 2010 Hinzu kommen immer mehr freigemeinnützige Anbieter, die (privat-gewerbliche) Tochtergesellschaften ausgründen, u.a. um so die Tarifverträge der Wohlfahrtsverbände auszuhebeln.…”

Section: Heinze Et Al: Social Entrepreneurship Im Deutschen Wohlfahrunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Social Entrepreneurship im deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaat – Hybride Organisationen zwischen Markt, Staat und Gemeinschaft

Heinze¹,

Schneiders²,

Grohs³

2011

Social Entrepreneurship – Social Business: Für Die Gesellschaft Unternehmen

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Heinze Et Al: Social Entrepreneurship Im Deutschen Wohlfahrunclassified

“…Auf die neuen Steuerungsmodelle reagierten die etablierten wohlfahrtsverbandlichen Träger unterschiedlich. Das Spektrum der Reaktionen reichte von der punktuellen Einführung betriebswirtschaftlicher Instrumente (Controlling/Marketing) bis hin zur Ausgründung von eigenständigen privat-gewerblichen Service-Gesellschaften (Dahme et al 2005;Grohs 201Oa;Schneiders 2010). …”

unclassified

Social Entrepreneurship im deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaat – Hybride Organisationen zwischen Markt, Staat und Gemeinschaft

Heinze¹,

Schneiders²,

Grohs³

2011

Social Entrepreneurship – Social Business: Für Die Gesellschaft Unternehmen

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In addition, certain social changes (such as the rising number of single-person households and increases in divorce and female employment) will have an effect on the ability of families to provide self-administered care. Overall, demand will rise as the capacity for self-help falls (Schneiders, 2010).…”

Section: Quasimarket Reforms In German Welfare Productionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Hybrid Organizations in Social Service Delivery in Quasimarkets

Grohs

2014

American Behavioral Scientist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the introduction of quasimarket principles in the mid-1990s, the German social service sector faced several challenges from above (the state), within (the organizations), and outside (new competitors and "players"). Within the social services, considerable differences prevail between subsectors; although all reforms have been oriented at the principle of (quasi)markets, the governance arrangements implemented have been rather divergent across subfields. This article compares the effects of the introduction of quasimarket principles in two subfields with very different governance architectures: youth welfare and old-age care. Basic findings include different degrees and variants of hybridity at the meso-level of local welfare arrangements as well as at the micro-level of the organizations in the field. The analysis shows a considerable effect of different governance regimes on the openness of the subfields to new competitors (profit-oriented and voluntary), the reactions of established third sector organizations (internal reforms and hybridization), and the modes of political steering (with varying degrees of informality and oversight).

show abstract

“…The sum spent by municipalities for social purposes has risen continuously in recent decades, and reached €40 billion in 2009 (Anton and Diemert, 2010: 11). In sum, rising demands face decreasing capacities for conventional provision (Schneiders, 2010: 137–9).…”

Section: Opportunities and Constraints For Social Innovation In The Gmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For our study, we selected two sectors that differ in this regard. While the sector of child and youth care is characterised by high persistence of established structures (Grohs, 2010), the elderly care sector has been subject to considerable liberalisation (Schneiders, 2010). We therefore conclude (hypothesis 2), that the elderly care sector provides more opportunities for social entrepreneurship, while innovations in the child and youth care sector are more often classified as social intrapreneurship.…”

Section: Opportunities and Constraints For Social Innovation In The Gmentioning

confidence: 99%

New Players on Crowded Playing Fields: The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Innovation in Germany

Ruddat

Schönauer

2014

Social Policy & Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article1 analyses whether and how social innovations can be implemented in a Conservative/Bismarckian welfare regime and society such as Germany. It examines the transferability and the relevance of this discourse and practice, and argues that, due to existing institutional structures and cultures, innovation by public sector intrapreneurship is more significant in Germany than through social entrepreneurship. The article challenges the assumption that social innovation emerges from entrepreneurship, and questions the level of attention and importance attached to this development

show abstract

Vom Altenheim zum Seniorenservice

Cited by 16 publications

References 0 publications

Social Entrepreneurship im deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaat – Hybride Organisationen zwischen Markt, Staat und Gemeinschaft

Social Entrepreneurship im deutschen Wohlfahrtsstaat – Hybride Organisationen zwischen Markt, Staat und Gemeinschaft

Hybrid Organizations in Social Service Delivery in Quasimarkets

New Players on Crowded Playing Fields: The Institutional Embeddedness of Social Innovation in Germany

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About