Water displacement leg volumetry in clinical studies - A discussion of error sources

Abstract

BackgroundWater displacement leg volumetry is a highly reproducible method, allowing the confirmation of efficacy of vasoactive substances. Nevertheless errors of its execution and the selection of unsuitable patients are likely to negatively affect the outcome of clinical studies in chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).DiscussionPlacebo controlled double-blind drug studies in CVI were searched (Cochrane Review 2005, MedLine Search until December 2007) and assessed with regard to efficacy (volume reduction of the leg), patient characteristics, and potential methodological error sources. Almost every second study reported only small drug effects (≤ 30 mL volume reduction). As the most relevant error source the conduct of volumetry was identified. Because the practical use of available equipment varies, volume differences of more than 300 mL - which is a multifold of a potential treatment effect - have been reported between consecutive measurements. Other potential error sources were insufficient patient guidance or difficulties with the transition from the Widmer CVI classification to the CEAP (Clinical Etiological Anatomical Pathophysiological) grading.SummaryPatients should be properly diagnosed with CVI and selected for stable oedema and further clinical symptoms relevant for the specific study. Centres require a thorough training on the use of the volumeter and on patient guidance. Volumetry should be performed under constant conditions. The reproducibility of short term repeat measurements has to be ensured.

Inter-observer and Intra-observer Variability in Volume Measurements of the Lower Extremity Using Perometer

“…However, exact time of volume measurement in healthy test subjects is considered of minor importance as long as measurements were standardized during the day. 14…”

Impact of compression stockings on leg swelling after arthroscopy – a prospective randomised pilot study

“…To date, few prospective clinical trials deal with the effects of compression therapy on post-operative leg swelling, particularly after knee arthroscopy, despite its high prevalence [7]. Furthermore, the exact measurement of circumference and volume of the lower limb is difficult [8]: water plethysmography can measure the lower leg volume exactly, but no correlation with the location of the swelling can be derived [9]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reliably measure circumference and volume, but its application is time consuming and expensive, it is also not routinely applicable to all patients (e.g.…”

Measuring Limb Volume: Accuracy and Reliability of Tape Measurement Versus Perometer Measurement

“…12 The difficulties in measuring limb volume are demonstrated by the number of techniques available: circumferential measurement (at predetermined short intervals along the limb, with these measurements being used to calculate volume), optoelectric limb volumetry (Perometer), computer tomography, 3D laser scanning, and various methods of water displacement. 13 It is difficult to know, at present, which measurement is the most accurate. Early work on this subject has validated the Perometer, 14 suggesting that it is a reliable and convenient tool for the measurement of limb volume.…”