2012
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

WegoLoc: accurate prediction of protein subcellular localization using weighted Gene Ontology terms

Abstract: Supplementary data is available at http://www.btool.org/WegoLoc.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This covered the cases where homologues of one or two of the A. pullulans varieties were not included in the original list due to annotation errors, or for other reasons. Clusters that contained less than half of the predicted secreted proteins (2274 proteins) were further analysed with online predictors CELLO [171] and WegoLoc [172], the latter with fungal BaCelLo and Höglund databases, with an e-value threshold of 1 × e -10 and a multiplex threshold of 1. The proteins were considered as secreted if they were predicted as such by at least three of four methods (our method described above, and three online predictors).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This covered the cases where homologues of one or two of the A. pullulans varieties were not included in the original list due to annotation errors, or for other reasons. Clusters that contained less than half of the predicted secreted proteins (2274 proteins) were further analysed with online predictors CELLO [171] and WegoLoc [172], the latter with fungal BaCelLo and Höglund databases, with an e-value threshold of 1 × e -10 and a multiplex threshold of 1. The proteins were considered as secreted if they were predicted as such by at least three of four methods (our method described above, and three online predictors).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…28 Subcellular localizations were added in Table 1, if at least three programs predicted the same localization of a protein at subcellular level.…”
Section: Prediction Of Subcellular Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, many programs have been developed to predict the function [6] and the subcellular localization of a targeted protein. [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23] Some of these programs provide additional information, e.g., protein-protein interactions [14], [19] or three-dimensional structure comparisons [18], although most just attempt to determine the subcellular compartment of the targeted protein. Additionally, studies have found that the more similar protein sequences are, the greater the likelihood that proteins with similar sequences will be found in the same subcellular localization [17], [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A hybrid approach combining machine learning and homology searching also can provide accurate subcellular-localization predictions. [22] The reason why certain computational tools provide improved subcellular localization prediction appears to be that GO information [8], [9], [10], [12], [15], [20], [21] or a homology-based modular structure comparison [23] is included in the prediction routine. However, if homologs for the protein of interest are not GO annotated or if a signature(s) and sequences similar to that of the query protein are not found in a relevant, searched database, such as InterPro [24], then a prediction cannot made.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%