What Are the Net Benefits of Reducing the Ozone Standard to 65 ppb? An Alternative Analysis

Abstract

In October 2015, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) lowered the level of the ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) from 0.075 ppm to 0.070 ppm (annual 4th highest daily maximum 8-h concentration, averaged over three years). The EPA estimated a 2025 annual national non-California net benefit of $1.5 to $4.5 billion (2011$, 7% discount rate) for a 0.070 ppm standard, and a −$1.0 to $14 billion net benefit for an alternative 0.065 ppm standard. The purpose of this work is to present a combined toxicological and economic assessment of the EPA’s benefit-cost analysis of the 2015 ozone NAAQS. Assessing the quality of the epidemiology studies based on considerations of bias, confounding, chance, integration of evidence, and application of the studies for future population risk estimates, we derived several alternative benefits estimates. We also considered the strengths and weaknesses of the EPA’s cost estimates (e.g., marginal abatement costs), as well as estimates completed by other authors, and provided our own alternative cost estimate. Based on our alternative benefits and cost calculations, we estimated an alternative net benefit of between −$0.3 and $1.8 billion for a 0.070 ppm standard (2011 $, 7% discount rate) and between −$23 and −$17 billion for a 0.065 ppm standard. This work demonstrates that alternative reasonable assumptions can generate very difference cost and benefits estimates that may impact how policy makers view the outcomes of a major rule.

Long-term air pollution exposure and diabetes risk in American older adults: a national cohort study

“…NO 2 is an air pollutant that originates mostly from traffic and high-temperature combustion processes (37). O 3 at the ground level is formed naturally and following a chemical reaction - where air pollutants emitted from sources such as traffic, industry, and wildfires (i.e., nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds) react with sunlight and organic gases, principally from vegetation (37, 38).…”

A Layered Recurrent Neural Network for Imputing Air Pollutants Missing Data and Prediction of NO2, O3, PM10, and PM2.5

“…Tropospheric ground-level ozone (O 3 ) is a secondary factor that can damage human health and ecosystem . O 3 concentration is one of the most serious oxidant factors that are harmful to human skin and lung tissues when inhaled [15,16]. Several side effects impair pulmonary function and cause respiratory symptoms such as headache, weight loss, cough, shortness of breath, hoarseness, and pain while breathing [17].…”

Ozone exposure upregulates the expression of host susceptibility protein TMPRSS2 to SARS-CoV-2

“…Nearly one-third of the United States population lives in areas with unhealthy levels of ozone 12,13 .…”

“…Nearly one-third of the United States population lives in areas with unhealthy levels of ozone 12, 13 . While it is already known that the unhealthy levels of ozone increase the risk for developing cardiopulmonary health problems 14–20 , it is unclear whether the ambient ozone levels regulate the expression of host susceptibility proteins to SARS-CoV-2 and, in turn, accounts for the varied susceptibilities of the human population to SARS-CoV-2.…”