Who counts most? assessing human well-being in sustainable forest management

Colfer, C.J.P.; Prabhu, R.; Günter, M.; McDougall, Cynthia; Porro, Noemi Sakiara Miyasaka

doi:10.17528/cifor/000768

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…But the question of who should be collaborating, and in whose interests, have proven to be key axes of differentiation between the two approaches. Mansourian (2018b) on CFLRP andColfer et al (1999) on ACM both emphasize the importance of such choices but base their discussions on differing assumptions and differing contexts. Participants in the Collaboratives tended to be members of formal institutions, 14 (many at grassroots level), though all the Collaboratives invited a variety of stakeholders to join in their planning (see Figure 1); and most involved some subset of non-USFS partners, to varying degrees, in implementation and monitoring.…”

Section: Figure 1 Who Participates In Cflrp Collaborativesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Forest landscape restoration: A comparison of two participatory approaches

C.J.P.¹,

Prabhu²

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As with conservation and development, the world of international forestry has been characterized by evolving trends and fads. In the late 1990s, as the Adaptive Collaborative Management (ACM) programme 1 got underway at the Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), the international forestry world was dominated by a search for 'sustainable forest management' (SFM). It was within that context that ACM was initially developed there.By the early 2010s, global interest in reforestation had begun to eclipse the earlier emphasis on SFM; at the same time the nationally-focused Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program (CFLRP, hereafter referred to as the Collaboratives --to reflect the multiple initiatives that took place under this programme) 2 began in the United States.Global forestry, development and conservation communities are now seriously interested in restoring forests. The multiple institutions now calling for forest restoration, as well as the expansive hectarages promised by governments in recent years, have been described by numerous authors (e.g.,

show abstract

Section: Figure 1 Who Participates In Cflrp Collaborativesmentioning

confidence: 99%