Winter wheat yield and quality related to tillage practice, input level and environmental conditions

Šíp, V.; Vavera, Radek; Chrpová, J.; Kusá, Helena; Růžek, Pavel

doi:10.1016/j.still.2013.05.002

Cited by 72 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In other words, different cultivars are stable under MIM and under HIM. Inconsistency of the stability rankings for GY, GPC and WGC indicates sensitivity of cultivars to crop management, and indirectly indicates that traits depend on both environmental and crop management effects (Šíp et al 2013;Tapley et al 2013). These inconsistencies also indicate the presence of interaction between cultivar and crop management.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing grain yield and quality traits stability of spring wheat cultivars at different crop management levels

Studnicki

Wijata

Sobczyński

et al. 2018

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Eleven spring wheat cultivars were compared in terms of the stability of their grain yield and grain quality. The cultivars' stability was evaluated separately at two different crop management levels-moderate-input management and high-input management. Three stability models were used for the two crop management levels based on a linear mixed model framework with restricted maximum likelihood. The Shukla model was the most appropriate for the evaluation of stability of tested spring wheat cultivars. The thousand-grain weight, starch content, Zeleny sedimentation value and test weight were characterized, and the stability ranking cultivars at moderate-input management level was mostly consistent with the rank of cultivars 24 for high-input management level. For grain yield, grain protein content and wet gluten content, the stability rankings were not consistent. Cultivars 'Monsun' and 'Parabola' are the most stable cultivars for grain yield in moderate-input management and high-input management, respectively. Cultivar 'Hewilla' was the stable cultivar for all quality traits at moderate-input management. Cultivar 'Arabella' was the most stable cultivar at high-input management level.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing grain yield and quality traits stability of spring wheat cultivars at different crop management levels

Studnicki

Wijata

Sobczyński

et al. 2018

Cereal Research Communications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Varga and Svecnjak (2006) reported that the application of N in the form of urea close to anthesis causes a reduction in W. Equally, excess nitrogen fertilization (above 300 kg ha -1 of N) reduces the proportion of high molecular weight glutenins (YUE et al, 2007). A negative correlation is frequently observed between TP and grain yield in wheat (GUARDA et al, 2004;ŠÍP et al, 2013). On the other hand, despite this negative correlation, it is possible to increase the productivity of grains concomitant with the increase in TP (PINNOW et al, 2013).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat

Silva

Zucareli

Fonseca

et al. 2019

SCA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The quality of wheat is a pre-eminent factor in the criteria for commercialization of this cereal, and several parameters contribute to the evaluation of wheat quality. The objective of this study was to verify the effects of nitrogen fertilization on the cover and the environment for wheat cultivars and the effects on the industrial quality of the grain. Furthermore, we sought to identify correlations between the parameters of industrial quality. Experiments were conducted in Londrina for 2 years, in two distinct environments (A1 and A2). The experimental design was a randomized complete block design with four replications. The cultivars IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo, and CD 120 were evaluated with different forms of nitrogen management: N1, without N in coverage; N2, 60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering; N3, 80 kg ha-1 of N in urea formulation (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 20 kg ha-1 in booting); N4, 100 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea (60 kg ha-1 in tillering and 40 kg ha-1 in booting); N5, 80 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 20 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting); N6, 100 kg ha-1 of N (60 kg ha-1 of N in the form of urea at the beginning of tillering, and 40 kg ha-1 of N in the form of ammonium sulfate in booting). Further, we evaluated grain yield, protein content, sedimentation volume with sodium dodecyl sulfate, and parameters of alveograph and farinograph. Nitrogen fertilization did not influence industrial quality parameters. The stability of the mass was influenced by the isolated effects of cultivars and the environment. The interaction of cultivars and environments influenced the parameters of alveograph and water absorption of the mass. The higher the protein content, the lower the stability of the mass, independent of the cultivar.

show abstract

“…Protein content was negatively correlated (r = -0.90) with wheat grain yield (Figure 2). Previous studies have reported negative relationship between grain yield and PC (Guarda et al, 2004;Šíp et al, 2013), concomitant increase in PC and grain yield (Pinnow et al, 2013) and lack of correlation (Bordes et al, 2008). Therefore, the correlation between grain yield and PC depends on factors such as environment, genotype and cultural practices (Pinnow et al, 2013;Šíp et al, 2013), so a generalization for this association is not possible.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 97%

Nitrogen management, cultivars and growing environments on wheat grain quality

Silva

Zucareli

Fonseca

et al. 2019

Rev. bras. eng. agríc. ambient.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of nitrogen (N) fertilization, environment and cultivars on the protein concentration, sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation test (SDSS) volume and falling number in wheat. The experimental design was a randomized blocks in split plot scheme with four repetions. Four wheat genotypes were evaluated under six N managements in four enviroment (subplots). The wheat genotypes evaluated were IPR Catuara TM, BRS Gaivota, Quartzo and CD 120. Protein concentration, SDS sedimentation test, falling number and grain yield were evaluated. Combined analysis of variance for the four environment was performed and means were compared by Tukey test at p ≤ 0.05. The environmental effect is greater than the genotype and N effects on protein concentration. The increase in protein concentration reduces grain yield of the cultivars tested. SDSS and falling number in wheat are influenced by the interaction between cultivar and environment and also by the N management. The protein concentration of grain has low influence on SDS sedimentation volume, so the topdressing N management has less accentuated effect on this response variable. The falling number does not vary among cultivars when the environment is suitable to pre-harvest sprouting. The use of topdressing N influences the falling number in wheat.

show abstract

Winter wheat yield and quality related to tillage practice, input level and environmental conditions

Cited by 72 publications

References 37 publications

Assessing grain yield and quality traits stability of spring wheat cultivars at different crop management levels

Assessing grain yield and quality traits stability of spring wheat cultivars at different crop management levels

Influence of nitrogen, environment, and cultivars on the industrial quality of wheat

Nitrogen management, cultivars and growing environments on wheat grain quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About