2009
DOI: 10.1287/opre.1080.0684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worst-Case Conditional Value-at-Risk with Application to Robust Portfolio Management

Abstract: This paper considers the worst-case Conditional Value-at-Risk (CVaR) in the situation where only partial information on the underlying probability distribution is available. The minimization of the worst-case CVaR under mixture distribution uncertainty, box uncertainty, and ellipsoidal uncertainty are investigated. The application of the worst-case CVaR to robust portfolio optimization is proposed, and the corresponding problems are cast as linear programs and second-order cone programs that can be solved effi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
283
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 462 publications
(288 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
283
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the "optimal" portfolios frequently have extreme or counterintuitive weights for some assets (Best and Grauer 1991;Broadie 1993;Chopra and Ziemba 1993). This obstacle also applies to strategies using risk measures other than variance such as VaR and CVaR (El Ghaoui et al 2003;Ceria and Stubbs 2006;Zhu and Fukushima 2008;Huang et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a result, the "optimal" portfolios frequently have extreme or counterintuitive weights for some assets (Best and Grauer 1991;Broadie 1993;Chopra and Ziemba 1993). This obstacle also applies to strategies using risk measures other than variance such as VaR and CVaR (El Ghaoui et al 2003;Ceria and Stubbs 2006;Zhu and Fukushima 2008;Huang et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This robust technique has obtained prodigious success since the late 1990s, especially in the field of optimization and control with uncertainty parameters Nemirovski 1998, 1999;El Ghaoui and Lebret 1997;Goldfarb and Iyengar 2003a). With respect to portfolio selection, the major contributions have come in the 21st century (see, for example, Rustem et al 2000;Costa and Paiva 2002;Ben-Tal et al 2002;Goldfarb and Iyengar 2003b;El Ghaoui et al 2003;Tütüncü and Koenig 2004;Pinar and Tütüncü 2005;Lutgens and Schotman 2006;Natarajan et al 2009;Garlappi et al 2007;Pinar 2007;Calafiore 2007;Huang et al 2008;Natarajan et al 2008a;Brown and Sim 2008;Natarajan et al 2008b;Shen and Zhang 2008;Elliott and Siu 2008;Zhu and Fukushima 2008). For a complete discussion of robust portfolio management and the associated solution methods, see Fabozzi et al (2007), Föllmer et al (2008), and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The worst case CVaR with respect to the Fréchet class of distributions for α ∈ (0, 1) is defined as (see Natarajan et al (2009a) and Zhu and Fukushima (2009)):…”
Section: Cvar Boundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Portfolio optimization using CVaR is implemented by dualizing its representation via the scenario set [23]. When the probability distribution is unknown but can be restricted to a scenario set containing all the potential distributions, Robust Conditional Value-at-Risk (Robust CVaR) can be defined as the worst-case CVaR when the distribution varies in this set [11,25]. The scenario set is constructed by structuring randomness in two stages and concentrating uncertainty at the first stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scenario set is constructed by structuring randomness in two stages and concentrating uncertainty at the first stage. Again, dualizing the representation enables portfolio optimization using Robust CVaR [11,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%