Friedens- Und Konfliktforschung 2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-531-92009-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zentrale Begriffe der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung: Konflikt, Gewalt, Krieg, Frieden

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In popular culture, social conflicts have a reputation for being destructive and disintegrating, whereas academia recognizes social conflicts also as a mechanism for relationship rejuvenation and development (Coser, , ; Dubiel, ; Hirschman, ; Simmel, ). Sociologists, in particular, consider conflicts a source of socially progressive and socially integrative outcomes for society and its subgroups (Bonacker & Imbusch, ). Sociological theory of socially progressive conflict outcomes argues that social conflict is an impetus for—not a consequence of—broader social changes (Bonacker & Imbusch, ; Marx & Engels, [1848]), and that conflict prevents a society from stagnation and loss of creativity (Coser, , p. 197).…”
Section: Sociological Theory Of Social Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In popular culture, social conflicts have a reputation for being destructive and disintegrating, whereas academia recognizes social conflicts also as a mechanism for relationship rejuvenation and development (Coser, , ; Dubiel, ; Hirschman, ; Simmel, ). Sociologists, in particular, consider conflicts a source of socially progressive and socially integrative outcomes for society and its subgroups (Bonacker & Imbusch, ). Sociological theory of socially progressive conflict outcomes argues that social conflict is an impetus for—not a consequence of—broader social changes (Bonacker & Imbusch, ; Marx & Engels, [1848]), and that conflict prevents a society from stagnation and loss of creativity (Coser, , p. 197).…”
Section: Sociological Theory Of Social Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sociologists, in particular, consider conflicts a source of socially progressive and socially integrative outcomes for society and its subgroups (Bonacker & Imbusch, ). Sociological theory of socially progressive conflict outcomes argues that social conflict is an impetus for—not a consequence of—broader social changes (Bonacker & Imbusch, ; Marx & Engels, [1848]), and that conflict prevents a society from stagnation and loss of creativity (Coser, , p. 197). Sociological theory of socially integrative conflict outcomes, in turn, proclaims that conflicts have a capacity for “achieving some kind of unity” among conflict parties (Simmel, , p. 13).…”
Section: Sociological Theory Of Social Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In der politikwissenschaftlich geprägten Friedens-und Konfliktforschung, von wo aus sich meine Fragestellung entwickelt hat, bewegt sich die Debatte gegenwärtig wieder in Richtung eines engen Verständnisses von Gewalt (Bonacker/Imbusch 2010;Koloma Beck/Schlichte 2014). Sie fokussiert vorrangig auf Begriffe, in denen Gewalt inklusive Schädigungsabsicht und politischem Kontext als direkte und physische gefasst wird.…”
Section: Epistemische Gewaltunclassified
“…7 In contrast, many religious traditions refer to peace as a state of mind that might only be achieved in the afterlife. 8 But peace may also be achieved at the individual, community, national, and global level in the form of social and communal harmony in plural societiesa dominant theme in Asian and African discourses on peace. These various conceptualizations of peace are by no means uncontested and have provoked debates on whether peace indeed means or should mean more than the absence of war; and whether in its positive form it is doomed to remain a utopia never to be reached and to broaden a concept that in the end becomes meaningless.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%