No abstract

Tissue engineering has emerged as an interesting field nowadays; it focuses on accelerating the auto-healing mechanism of tissues rather than organ transplantation. It involves implanting an In Vitro cultured initiative tissue or a scaffold loaded with tissue regenerating ingredients at the damaged area. Both techniques are based on the use of biodegradable, biocompatible polymers as scaffolding materials which are either derived from natural (e.g. alginates, celluloses, and zein) or synthetic sources (e.g. PLGA, PCL, and PLA). This review discusses in detail the recent applications of different biomaterials in tissue engineering highlighting the targeted tissues besides the in vitro and in vivo key findings. As well, smart biomaterials (e.g. chitosan) are fascinating candidates in the field as they are capable of elucidating a chemical or physical transformation as response to external stimuli (e.g. temperature, pH, magnetic or electric fields). Recent trends in tissue engineering are summarized in this review highlighting the use of stem cells, 3D printing techniques, and the most recent 4D printing approach which relies on the use of smart biomaterials to produce a dynamic scaffold resembling the natural tissue. Furthermore, the application of advanced tissue engineering techniques provides hope for the researchers to recognize COVID-19/host interaction, also, it presents a promising solution to rejuvenate the destroyed lung tissues. Graphical abstract

Brimonidine tartrate (BRT) is a hydrophilic a 2 adrenergic agonist used for the treatment of glaucoma. Glaucoma is an ocular disease affecting the anterior segment of the eye requiring lifetime treatment. Owing to the obstacles facing ocular delivery systems and hydrophilicity of BRT, frequent administration of the eye drops is required. Niosomes have been widely used to improve the ocular bioavailability of the topically applied drugs and to enhance the ocular residence time. However, they have drawbacks as physical instability, aggregation, and loss of the entrapped drug. For this reason, BRT proniosomes were prepared to overcome niosomal instability issues. A D-optimal design was utilized to determine the optimum conditions for preparation of the proniosomal gels. Independent variables were amount of surfactant, surfactant:cholesterol ratio, and type of surfactant used. The dependent variables were entrapment efficiency (EE%), particle size, percentage of drug released after 2 h (Q 2h), and percentage of drug released after 24 h (Q 24h). The optimum formula was suggested with desirability 0.732 and the composition of 540 mg Span 60 and 10:1 surfactant:cholesterol ratio. The results obtained after reconstitution were; EE% of 79.23 ± 1.12% particle size of 810.95 ± 16.758 nm, polydispersity index (PDI) 0.6785 ± 0.213, zeta potential 59.1 ± 0.99 mV, Q 2h 40.98 ± 1.29%, Q 8h 63.35 ± 6.07%, and Q 24h ¼ 91.11 ± 1.76%. Transmission electron microscope imaging of the formula showed the typical spherical shape of niosomes. In-vivo pharmacodynamic study assured the improved ocular bioavailability of BRT selected formula when compared with Alphagan V R P with relative AUC 0-24 of 5.024 and 7.90 folds increase in the mean residence time (MRT). Lack of ocular irritation of the formula was assured by Draize test.

No abstract

In situ forming implants (IFIs) are non-surgical approach using biodegradable polymers to treat bone fractures. The study aimed at preparing dual-drug-loaded IFIs to deliver pitavastatin (osteogenic drug) and tedizolid (antibiotic) using zein as the implant matrix via solvent-induced phase inversion method. At first, several investigations were done on pitavastatin-loaded zein IFIs, where three concentrations of zein were used (10, 20, and 30% w/v). IFIs were evaluated for their solidification time, rheological properties, injectability, and in vitro release. IFIs containing bioactive glass nanoparticles were prepared by the addition of non-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles (BGT0; 1, 3, 5, and 10% w/v) or titanium-doped bioactive glass nanoparticles (BGT5; 1% w/v) to the selected concentration of zein (30% w/v) and then evaluated. The optimized dual-medicated implant (D-ZIFI 1) containing pitavastatin, tedizolid, sodium hyaluronate (3% w/v), and BGT5 (1% w/v) was prepared and compared to IFI lacking both sodium hyaluronate and BGT5 (D-ZIFI 2). D-ZIFI 1 and 2 sustained the release profiles of both drugs for 28 days. SEM images proved the interconnected porous structure of D-ZIFI 1 due to sodium hyaluronate. In vivo studies on surgically induced bone defects in Sprague–Dawley rats signified the proper accelerated bone healing ability of D-ZIFI 1 over D-ZIFI 2. Results presented D-ZIFI 1 as a promising, effective, non-surgical approach for bone healing.