This study aimed at elaborating a forecasting tool of the phenology of the serious pest Lobesia botrana in Southwestern Spanish vineyards, by analysing data on male catches in sex pheromone traps recorded over a 12‐year period. Our data confirmed the minor importance of the first generation which appears during flowering time, both in terms of male trap catches and damage of L. botrana to the inflorescences. Therefore, data related to the first flight were not further processed, although they were considered for the computation of degree‐days of the following generations. The outcome of the elaboration of temperature accumulations and data on male captures for the second and third flights was a statistically acceptable linear behaviour obtained by properly transforming the variables. The models established proved to be efficient and may represent a useful tool to improve the efficacy of integrated pest management strategies targeting L. botrana in the studied region.

No abstract

1 Assignment co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the COMPETE 2020-Operational Programme Competitiveness and Internationalization (POCI) and national funds by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) under the POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007460 project. REPRESENTING DISABILITY IN MUSEUMS. IMAGINARY AND IDENTITIES 14 distancing of this social group. In this sense, this chapter addresses the importance of museums as essential spaces for communicating ideas that may lead to social transformation and to a change of attitudes towards disability.

RESUMO: Este artigo explora algumas inquietações e valores que fazem parte da reflexão sobre os processos de coabitação flexível no âmbito da formação em museologia, produzindo teorias mais matizadas, práticas mais refletidas e, porventura, museus menos ilusórios. Introduzse, ainda, uma reflexão sobre a própria natureza do conhecimento em museologia. O conhecimento é teorizado como um quase objeto, um híbrido entre sujeito, humano e não-humanos, desafiando a separação entre sujeito e objeto, entre natureza e sociedade, entre teoria e prática. A museologia é aqui apresentada enquanto objeto quase de investigação / formação, como espaço de questionamento não delimitador mas de contornos cada vez mais de fronteira, impermanente e pertencendo ao que se vem denominando de Modo 2/3 de produção de conhecimento. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Museologia. Formação. Espaços-quase.ABSTRACT: This article explores some of the concerns and values that are part of the discussion about processes of flexible cohabitation in training in museology producing more nuanced theories, more reflective practices, and possibly less illusory museums. It also introduces a discussion on the very nature of knowledge in museology. Knowledge is theorized as a quasiobject, a hybrid between subject, human and nonhuman, challenging the separation between subject and object, between nature and society, between theory and practice. Museology is presented here as a quasi-object of research / training as a space for questioning not delimiter but which increasingly adopts border contours, impermanent and belonging to what has been denominated Mode 2/3 of knowledge production.

No abstract