Violence is often done by police in the investigation to get a confession the suspect. This behavior has become a habit that can be referenced from various research results, which are caused by lack of supervisory agency investigation, an incomplete legal instruments, the protection of the institution, and the unprofessional attitude of the police. This situation causes no chance to fight for a suspect his rights and the perpetrators of violence inaccessible. Professionalism associated with standardized moral issues into the code of conduct, and any violation of ethics code indicates a problem in the body of moral police. There should be a moral improvement in the investigator for investigation can take place properly and correctly according to expectations. Key words: police violence, investigation, criminal justice system, code of conduct

ABSTRAK Era Industri 4.0 dan Masyarakat 5.0 mempunyai karakteristik yang berbeda dan berdampak pula bagi jenis viktimisiasi khususnya akibat cybercrime. Hal ini berkorelasi dengan karakter pada era tersebut antara lain digitalisasi, rekayasa intelegensia dan internet of thing,  Melalui penelitian kepustakaan dapat dijelasakan bahwa dalam perspektif viktimologi korban atas cybercrime. Korban cybercrime mengalami berupa kerugian materi, akibat psikologis akibat fisik dan  akibat sosial. Viktimisasi  cybercrime dapat dijelaskan dengan The Lifestyle-Routine Activities Theory  (L-RAT). Perlindungan hukum korban cybercrime mendasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Atas Perubahan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik dapat dikatakan  tidak terdapat perlindungan hukum secara signifikan dapat dirasakan oleh para korbannya Seharusnya terdapat sanksi berupa restitusi dan/atau pemberian kompensasi. Hal ini selaras dengan karakter masyarakat 5.0 yang lebih menghormati keberadaan manusia. ABSTRACTThe Industrial Era 4.0 and Society 5.0 have different characteristics and this has an impact on the types of victimization, especially those caused by cybercrime. This correlates with the characteristics of that era, including digitalization, intelligent engineering and the internet of things. Through library research, it can be explained from a victimological perspective that victims of cybercrime suffer losses in the form of material losses, psychological suffering, physical suffering and social suffering. Cybercrime victimization can be explained by the lifestyle-routine activities theory (L-RAT). The legal protection of cybercrime victims is based on Law Number 19 of 2016 on Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions and it can be said that there is no significant legal protection that can be felt by the victims. There should be sanctions in the form of restitution and/or compensation. This corresponds to the nature of society 5.0 which is more respectful of human existence.

Green victimology refers to the study of victimology that focuses on victims of environmental harm. The object of this new study cannot be separated from the philosophical values that underlie the growth of green victimology. Through literature research based on secondary data, this research focuses on two studies. The first is about the philosophical foundations of green victimology and the second is about the perspective of green victimology in the Law Number 32 og 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management. Based on the results of the research, it can be stated that the foundation of green victimology ecocentrism which sees that the environmental entities have intrinsic value in virtue of their own interests apart from its instrumental or utilitarian value for humans. This is different from the values underlying the previous victimological study that was based on anthropocentrism. Ecocentrism has been adopted in the Law Number 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management.

Restorative justice is a pattern of dispute resolution which emphasizes the responsibility of the perpetrator for the consequences of his actions while at the same time paying attention to the position of the victim. This is not simply about punishing the offender; it is about obtaining justice through discussion outside of the criminal justice system to ensure the situation can be returned to its prior state. Islamic law offers a concept of restorative justice called islah, which is a technique to resolve conflicts between parties by forgiving one another. Salatiga City, the most tolerant city in Indonesia, is where this study is being conducted. The idea of restorative justice is used to resolve disputes through the role of a lurah (head of neighborhood), who is responsible for upholding communal order. It is intriguing to investigate whether the reality of restorative justice in Salatiga City can achieve the three main objectives of the law as outlined by Gustav Radburch: justice, benefit, and legal certainty. This study employs a qualitative methodology and a socio-legal research design. Interviews with the offenders, victims, and the lurah who served as the government's mediator resulted in the gathering of data. The findings of this study demonstrate that Salatiga City's restorative justice method to conflict settlement has achieved the goals of justice and legal advantage and can even foster good will among the parties. The absence of lurah's legal standing in the resolution of this issue, however, does not satisfy the requirement of legal clarity. For Salatiga City residents, a legal foundation is required for restorative justice-based legal dispute settlement

<p>Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mereview Rancangan Undang-Undang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual (RUUPKS) dalam perspektif Viktimologi dengan titik berat pada perlindungan hukum dan perhatian hukum terhadap korban akibat kekerasan seksual. Kajian ini dilakukan dengan melalui  <em>library research</em> dengan sumber data sekunder berupa RUU PKS dan bahan referensi terkait. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukan bahwa RUU PKS sangat berorientasi terhadap korban. Hal ini ditunjukan dengan  banyaknya hak-hak korban maupun  keluarga korban serta perhatian hukum terhadap korban. Hak-hak korban dinyatakan secara tegas pada Pasal 22 hingga Pasal 31 RUU PKS. Perhatian Hukum terhadap korban terdapat dalam konsidertan hingga pasal demi pasal dengan adanya regulasi yang mewajibkan serta melarang aparat penegak hukum yang meliputi penyidik, jaksa penuntut umum hingga hakim. Selain itu juga terdapat aturan tentang pasrtisipasi masyarakat untuk ikut serta mencegah terjadinya kekerasan seksual hingga melakukan bantuan secara sosial terhadap korban kekerasan seksual. Namun demikian RUU PKS diprediksi sangat berat untuk dapat efektif mencapai tujuan dikarenakan besarnya dana yang dubutuhkan dalam rangka untuk membentuk Pusat Pelayanan Terpadu beserta pelaksanaan tugasnya.  Untuk itu maka komitmen pemerintah dalam penyediaan dana untuk mendukung sepenuhnya maksud dibuat nya UU PKS menjadi sangat urgen.<strong></strong></p><p> </p>