Usaha adalah suatu lembaga khusus yang dibentuk berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Prak k Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat untuk menegakkan hukum persaingan usaha. Tidak berkedudukan sebagai 'lembaga penegak hukum' yang sesungguhnya menyebabkan KPPU dak memiliki daya paksa dalam hal pemanggilan para pihak maupun dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi. Selain itu, banyaknya putusan KPPU yang dibatalkan dalam proses upaya hukum (yang disebut sebagai keberatan) yang diajukan pihak pelanggar pada akhirnya menyebabkan dak terciptanya kepas an hukum bagi para pihak. Tulisan ini berupaya memperlihatkan gambaran pelaksanaan putusan persaingan usaha dalam prak k dalam njauan Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Prak k Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat serta menginden fikasi kendala-kendala dan upaya dalam penegakkan hukum persaingan usaha di Indonesia agar tercipta kepas an hukum. Kata Kunci: kepas an hukum, KPPU, pelaksanaan putusan, penegakan hukum, persaingan usaha The Problem of Law Enforcement in Business Compe on in Establishing Legal Certainty

Ease of Doing Business (EoDB) is a business ease indicator which issued by the World Bank. There are eleven indicators that become a benchmark in measuring the ease of doing business in a country. One of the indicators is related to the settlement of investment dispute or in this case is the enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency. Based on the Doing Business of 2019 report, currently the rating of ease of business in Indonesia occupies the position of 73 (seventy three). Indonesia's EoDB rating is still far from the target, which is ranked 40 (forty) in the world. This is due to dispute settlement in Indonesia still has a number of issues, both in terms of basic regulations, court proceedings and execution. Whereas in the business world (based on the EoDB indicator) a inexpensive, fast, and simple legal dispute settlement tool is needed. This research is a normative juridical legal research with the descriptive method of analysis, with results show that there are still no applying regulations of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning on Investment which focused on discussing investment disputes, so that there is not clear legal certainty regarding to investment in Indonesia. In addition, there are also a number of issues related to bankruptcy cases, both of which are Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Obligation for Payment of Debts, some of which can lead to certain interests, length of bankruptcy court proceedings, and legal certainty after bankruptcy decisions. A breakthrough or update is needed that can support EoDB, one of which can be done in the field of investment dispute settlement especially related to the enforcing contracts and resolving insolvency by making applying regulations and revising related regulations.

In Indonesia the distribution of inheritance, there are often disputes between parties who have an interest in each other. This makes some people choose to make a Inher itance Certificate which aims to prove the parties entitled to inheritance from the testator. In practice, heirs are often found that contain incorrect statements and serve as evidence in court proceedings, as found in Supreme Court Decision Number 121/Pid/2017/PT.DKI. This article discusses the power of proof of authentic deeds which contain incorrect statements in terms of the perspective of the Civil Procedure Code and the validity of an agreement based on authentic deeds which contain incorrect statements based on the Civil Code. Normative juridical research methods are used in this study, namely in-depth analysis of the positive regulations concerned and also field research related to the process of making a Certificate of Inheritance in the Religious Courts, Notaries, and Village Offi ce. Based on the results showed the Inheritance Certificate containing incorrect information, still has the power of proof attached as long as no cancellation is submitted to the judge by the parties who feel disadvantaged, and as long as there is no decision from the court stating that the deed is invalid. However, if there has been a decision from a judge stating that a certain authentic deed is invalid, then the deed no longer has the perfect proof of strength as an authentic deed.

No abstract

Child marriages are common throughout Indonesia. This is due to a strong influence of Indonesian customs and religion that strongly influence the lives of its people. It is worth pointing that marriage age arrangements in Indonesian Marriage Law reinforces that legal age for men is 19 years and 16 years for women. The 2012 statistics show that Indonesia is the 37th highest in the world in child marriage, while at the Southeast Asian level, this country ranks second after Cambodia. The ranking went up dramatically since in 2016, based on UNICEF, Indonesia ranked the 7th in child marriage worldwide. This means that the practice of child marriage in Indonesia happens, especially to women at the age of 18 years, and there is no discrimination related to the age of marriage. Against this matter, there has been a file for judicial review that demands marriage age for men and women to be pegged at the age of 18 years. However, the Judge of the Constitutional Court, through Decision Number 30-74/PUU-XII/2014, states that age of marriage remains valid for the 19-year-old for man and 16-year-old for women. The struggle does not stop there because at this time, there a national movement of STOP CHILD MARRIAGE formed by civil organisations in cooperation with the Commission of Child Protection and Ministry of Woman Empowerment and Child Protection. This movement sees that the practice of child marriage is a national emergency problem that must be addressed seriously. Further, this movement demands immediate enactment of government regulation in favour of the law which must promptly revise the Marriage Law, especially related to the marriage age.