Two interesting publications in the European Respiratory Journal recently by RUSSO et al. [1] and LEUNG et al. [2] discuss the possible role of nicotine in this pandemic and the "furious pursuit for better therapeutics". Not surprisingly, the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2) is known to be the likely host receptor for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Further, at a basic level, cellular mechanisms of nicotinic receptor activity promote SARS-CoV-2 entry and proliferation in epithelial cells through co-expression of ACE-2. Hence, this is the theory postulated by OLDS and KABBANI [3] for how nicotine consumption represents a special risk factor in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). On the other hand, and very surprisingly, Changeux et al. [4] hypothesise that the nicotinic receptor also plays a key role in the pathophysiology and might represent a target for the prevention and control of COVID-19 infection. Again, on a basic level, the hypothesis is that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is a nicotinic agent which competes with nicotine for the receptor. The backbone of this hypothesis proposes that under controlled settings, nicotinic agents (such as nicotine patches) could provide an efficient treatment for an acute infection such as COVID-19. So, tenuously, is the argument centred around the need for data about alternative nicotine delivery systems and their risk/benefit ratio in relation to COVID-19 [5]? Possibly, but are there perhaps other ways…? Soluble ACE-2 might impact viral spread, since binding to soluble receptor has been shown to block SARS-CoV-2 entry. BATLLE et al. [6] argue that, if given in its soluble form as an appropriate recombinant ACE-2 protein, this may represent a new tool to combat the spread of COVID-19. Similarly, GUO et al. [7] opined that exogenous supplement of recombinant human (rh)ACE-2 might be a brilliant idea in the treatment of COVID-19. Here the soluble ACE-2 may act as the bait to neutralise the spike protein on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2, thus inhibiting entry. Further, GUO et al. [7] referenced a recent study that demonstrated fusion protein of rhACE-2 (with an Fc fragment) showing high affinity binding to the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2. This, again, provides a basis for further drug development as fusion protein technology has been very successfully deployed in various therapeutic areas, such as rheumatology and haemophilia.
The present study investigates the effect of water temperature on the development of deformities during embryonic and larval stages of European sea bass, Dicentrarchus labrax (L.). Two temperature conditions were examined in duplicate by studying the presence of skeletal deformities in a sample of 45 to 51 fish taken from each population at the end of the rearing trials [20-23 mm total length (TL)]. The results indicated that water temperature during the embryonic and larval phase has significant effects on deformation of the branchiostegal rays (P < 0.001), but not of the mouth and the fins (P > 0.05). At 15°C, 27.2-33.4% of the examined fish had branchiostegal rays of abnormal shape and/or orientation, whereas at 20°C this deformity had a frequency of only 4.0-4.1%. The frequency distribution graph of branchiostegal counts demonstrated a significant deviation in the deformed fish from the normal (seven rays on each side of the body) phenotype at both temperatures tested. This deviation was mainly expressed as a lack of one to four rays (56.7% of deformed fish), or the formation of one extra ray (26.7% of deformed fish) (P < 0.001, G-test). The results are discussed in respect to the possible mechanisms of temperature effects on the development of skeletal deformities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.