No abstract

Aim: Several case reports have shown that hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation developed in hepatitis C patients with a current or previous HBV infection during direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment, which led to severe hepatitis or death in some cases. However, its precise frequency and risk factors are not entirely clear. We analyzed a prospective cohort. Methods:We analyzed HBV reactivation in 461 consecutive hepatitis C patients who received 12 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for genotype 1 or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for genotype 2 at multiple centers.Results: By the examination of the preserved sera at baseline, 159 patients (34%) were identified as seropositive for HBV core antibody (anti-HBc) and were included in the subsequent analysis; 4 patients were positive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), and the others were negative. Serum HBV DNA was undetectable or was detectable but <20 IU/mL at baseline for all patients. Serial measurement of HBV DNA at 4 weeks and 12 weeks in the preserved serum samples was available in 147 patients and identified HBV reactivation (defined as the appearance of serum HBV DNA ≥20 IU/mL) in 2 HBsAg-positive and 3 HBsAg-negative patients. No patient developed HBVassociated hepatitis. Patients who developed HBV reactivation had significantly lower anti-HBs titers and higher serum alanine transferase levels before treatment.Conclusion: Hepatitis B virus reactivation during direct-acting antiviral therapies occurs in 3.4% (5/147) of patients who are positive for anti-HBc. A low titer of anti-HBs and a high serum alanine transferase level prior to treatment are associated with reactivation in this patient group.

Aim In patients with chronic hepatitis C, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurs at a certain frequency, even if a sustained virologic response (SVR) is achieved by antiviral treatment. Old age, liver fibrosis, and high post‐treatment α‐fetoprotein (AFP) level are typical risk factors of post‐SVR HCC. We examined whether the frequencies and factors of HCC in patients with an SVR achieved from interferon treatment changed. Methods Among patients prospectively registered for pegylated interferon and ribavirin treatment, 2021 with an SVR without HCC development during the treatment period were followed up. The mean observation period was 49.5 ± 26.2 months. Results The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that older age, diabetes mellitus, advanced liver disease, and higher post‐treatment AFP level were the independent risk factors throughout the observation period. The annual occurrence rate of HCC was 0.74% in the third year, 0.54% in the fourth year, and 0.40% in the fifth year; it gradually decreased from the third year. Because the time course hazards for HCC changed at 48 months, we separately analyzed its risk factors before and after this change point. The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the four above‐mentioned factors were significantly related to HCC development within 4 years. Conversely, the univariable Cox regression analysis only identified diabetes mellitus as a significant factor for HCC development after 4 years. Conclusion The frequency of HCC in hepatitis C patients who achieved an SVR from interferon treatment decreased during the observation period, and its risk factors changed between the early and late periods.

No abstract

No abstract