In the digital age, it is critical for both healthcare professionals and consumers to electronically express, receive, and process important health information. This is especially true for populations with language barriers and low literacy. Visual literacy and health literacy enable optimal health communication and wellbeing. A standardized interface terminology is a linguistic tool that can be used to convey health information at the human-computer interface. The Omaha System has been evaluated and found to be a promising standard for use as a simple, standardized terminology that may promote health literacy and communication between healthcare professionals and consumers. However, a method for visually representing health concepts described by the Omaha System has not been developed. The purpose of this study was to develop a complete set of 42 icons that convey the meaning of each of the 42 Omaha System problem concepts as defined by Martin (2005). Design thinking, universal design methods, and informal survey evaluations were used to determine appropriate imagery for the icons. Data-based revisions were incorporated after each of three informal survey evaluations. The resulting set of 42 icons for Omaha System problem concepts is available in the public domain. Future plans are to conduct extensive global evaluation of concept validity and usefulness of the icons across literacy levels.
Omaha System problem concepts describe a comprehensive, holistic view of health in simple terms that have been represented in a set of prototype icons intended for universal use by consumers and clinicians. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Omaha System prototype icons internationally across ten languages through an on-line survey and in-person focus groups. The icons were generally rated above 3 on a scale of 1 to 5 by 1568 survey respondents, with notable exceptions for some of the more abstract concepts. Overall, the icons were rated 3.49 on a scale of 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree, with a range of 3.09 (Japanese language) to 3.88 (Norwegian language). A pattern of differential agreement was noted among respondents from Asiatic languages compared to all other languages. Feedback from survey respondents and focus group participants was used to refine the icons. General themes related to icon development were synthesized from focus group interviews. Further research should continue to refine and evaluate the icons in different languages for international use to support health literacy through visual literacy.
ISSUE Design students can integrate theoretical knowledge from foundation‐level design courses into real‐world applications through basic research exercises.
GOAL Through the development of research questions, students gain experience in problem seeking, basic research methods, ond analytical skills. They learn first‐hand that the seemingly abstract concepts taught in foundation classes can be tested and new knowledge gained.
APPLICATION Introducing students to basic theory testing through the use of hypothesis development and application of basic research methods provides a link between design concepts and how those concepts function in the designed environment. Students utilize the course readings not as passive learners but as active challengers of concepts. They extend the concept from the visual to the cognitive thus enhancing integration of the knowledge and experience.
DESCRIPTION Students collaboratively develop research questions based on course readings. They discuss the merits of each question and come to agreement on a question and suitable hypothesis. The class then establishes a method for testing the hypothesis and carries out the research. The collected data are analyzed, and the class works together to draw conclusions.
CONCLUSION Students increase their ability to read critically and learn to develop meaningful research questions research questions. Active involvement in examining applications of design theory provides students with a greater understanding of the design concept being tested and helps them to make the cognitive link between theory and practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.