To determine whether resistance to Fusarium head blight in winter wheat is horizontal and non-species specific, 25 genotypes from five European countries were tested at six locations across Europe in the years 1990, 1991, and 1992. The five genotypes from each country had to cover the range from resistant to susceptible. The locations involved were Wageningen, Vienna, Rennes, Hohenheim, Oberer Lindenhof, and Szeged. In total, 17 local strains of Fusarium culmorum, F. graminearum, and F. nivale were used for experimental inoculation. One strain, F. culmorum IPO 39-01, was used at all locations. Best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) for the head blight ratings of the genotypes were formed within each particular location for each combination of year and strain. The BLUPs over all locations were collected in a genotype-by environment table in which the genotypic dimension consisted of the 25 genotypes, while the environmental dimension was made up of 59 year-by-strain-by-location combinations. A multiplicative model was fitted to the genotype by-environment interaction in this table. The inverses of the variances of the genotype-by-environment BLUPs were used as weights. Interactions between genotypes and environments were written as sums of products between genotypic scores and environmental scores. After correction for year-by-location influence very little variation in environmental scores could be ascribed to differences between strains. This provided the basis for the conclusion that the resistance to Fusarium head blight in winter wheat was of the horizontal and non-species specific type. There was no indication for any geographical pattern in virulence genes. Any reasonable aggressive strain, a F. culmorum strain for the cool climates and a F. graminearum strain for the warmer humid areas, should be satisfactory for screening purposes.
Hybrid breeding facilitates a maximum exploitation of heterosis. The objectives of our research were to (i) examine the magnitude of heterosis over the mid‐ and better parent for yield, yield components, and quality traits in Central European spring durum wheat and (ii) investigate the efficiency of parental selection based on mid‐parent value or general combining ability effects. Sixteen inbred lines and 40 incomplete factorial crosses were field‐evaluated for eight agronomic traits at 10 environments in Germany. For grain yield, the hybrids yielded on average 10% higher than the mid‐parent performance, and the maximum superiority was 22%. The significantly positive contrast between inbreeding depression and mid‐parent heterosis for grain yield indicated the presence of positive additive x additive epistatic interactions. Furthermore, the best hybrid outperformed the best line variety by 1.01 Mg ha−1 We conclude that there is a potential for hybrid breeding in durum wheat.
A comparison betweeen the electropherograms of the spelt and wheat cultivars showed specific differences in the gliadin band patterns which provided the possibility of a clear classification into spelt or wheat. A special nomenclature was developed to be able to improve the presentation of the gliadin band pattern of spelt, which is different from that of wheat. This nomenclature, however, has not yet been applied to other cereals. The gliadin band patterns were presented in a schematic form. As a parameter for comparison, idealized band patterns of both wheat and spelt were developed by comparing the proportions of the bands of all available types. When comparing the gliadin band patterns of the spelt cross-breeds with their corresponding parental generations, it was noted that the same parental bands were not always transmitted and that the cross-breeds showed differences in the intensity, mobility, occurrence, and the splitting of single bands. In general it can be said that the band pattern of the daughter generation - even in the examined F(5) and F(6) generations - is more similar to the band pattern of the mother than to that of the father, which proves a maternal effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.