The genomic DNA fingerprinting technique known as repetitive-sequence-based polymerase chain reaction (rep-PCR) was evaluated as a tool to differentiate subspecies of Clavibacter michiganensis, with special emphasis on C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, the pathogen responsible for bacterial canker of tomato. DNA primers (REP, ERIC, and BOX), corresponding to conserved repetitive element motifs in the genomes of diverse bacterial species, were used to generate genomic fingerprints of C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis, C. michiganensis subsp. sepedonicus, C. michiganensis subsp. nebraskensis, C. michiganensis subsp. tessellarius, and C. michiganensis subsp. insidiosum. The rep-PCR-generated patterns of DNA fragments observed after agarose gel electrophoresis support the current division of C. michiganensis into five subspecies. In addition, the rep-PCR fingerprints identified at least four types (A, B, C, and D) within C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis based on limited DNA polymorphisms; the ability to differentiate individual strains may be of potential use in studies on the epidemiology and host-pathogen interactions of this organism. In addition, we have recovered from diseased tomato plants a relatively large number of naturally occurring avirulent C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis strains with rep-PCR fingerprints identical to those of virulent C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis strains.
Chemical applications, with the exception of mancozeb, reduced population sizes and spread of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis among tomato seedlings in the greenhouse and impacted subsequent plant development and yield in the field. While applications of copper hydroxide, copper hydroxide/mancozeb, copper hydroxide/mancozeb (premixed 12 h before spraying), streptomycin, and streptomycin/copper hydroxide to seedlings in the greenhouse did not differ significantly from the inoculated control, the trend was for these treatments to increase the survival of inoculated transplants in the field in comparison to the inoculated control. In the field, inoculated controls produced yields that were 63% (1995) and 51% (1996) of those produced by uninoculated controls. In both years, with the exception of mancozeb in 1995, all treatments resulted in yields similar to those obtained with the uninoculated control. Plant survival and yield in the field were severely affected when transplants had a pathogen population of >/= x 10(8) CFU/g of tissue. All treatments, with the exception of mancozeb, limited C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis populations to <5.0 x 10(5). None of the treatments significantly reduced the incidence of fruit spotting compared with that of the inoculated control.
Development of the bird's eye fruit lesion of tomato was studied by inoculating flowers and the surface of young tomato fruit with strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Flowers were sprayed once or twice with C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis at 108 CFU/ml. The maximum incidence (80%) and severity (12 spots/fruit) of spotted fruit resulted when inoculum was sprayed twice, 3 days apart. Flowers were most susceptible to infection 2 days after anthesis. When a paintbrush was used to apply inoculum to the surface of small fruit, a large number of fruit spots (≤456 spots/fruit) resulted. Even strains determined to be avirulent based on a tomato stem inoculation assay and a hypersensitive response on four-o'clock leaves (Mirabilis jalapa) were able to produce fruit spots, although at a reduced level. The inoculation methods developed in this study can provide opportunities to observe subtle host-pathogen interactions between C. michiganensis subsp. michiganensis strains and tomato and to help formulate methods to quantify infection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.