We conducted a 10-center, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy and toxicity of four antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures in 622 adults. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, or primidone and were followed for two years or until the drug failed to control seizures or caused unacceptable side effects. Overall treatment success was highest with carbamazepine or phenytoin, intermediate with phenobarbital, and lowest with primidone (P less than 0.002). Differences in failure rates of the drugs were explained primarily by the fact that primidone caused more intolerable acute toxic effects, such as nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and sedation. Decreased libido and impotence were more common in patients given primidone. Phenytoin caused more dysmorphic effects and hypersensitivity. Control of tonic-clonic seizures did not differ significantly with the various drugs. Carbamazepine provided complete control of partial seizures more often than primidone or phenobarbital (P less than 0.03). Overall, carbamazepine and phenytoin are recommended drugs of first choice for single-drug therapy of adults with partial or generalized tonic-clonic seizures or with both.

No abstract

A verbal learning test patterned after and using the same format as the Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test was administered to the following three groups: (1) patients with left temporal lobe epilepsy (L-TLE) as defined by EEG criteria (n = 11); (2) patients with right temporal lobe epilepsy (n = 10); and (3) normal controls (n = 11). Performance was highly similar for all three groups during the five immediate recall learning trials. The performance of the L-TLE group, averaged across three delayed recall trials (free recall, phonemic cued recall, semantic cued recall), was significantly poorer than that of the other two groups. The L-TLE group showed the worst performance on the phonemic cued recall trial, poor performance on the delayed free recall trial, and relatively intact performance on the semantic cued recall trial. Immediate and delayed free recall and phonemic and semantic cued recall for the distractor list did not discriminate groups. Word frequency, word presentation order, and concrete versus abstract words did not have different effects across groups.

No abstract

No abstract