EMPs may be involved in the immune and inflammatory processes that take part in artery atherosclerosis and that they do so by regulating Th1/Th2 differentiation and function. They may play an important role in the pathogenesis of coronary atherosclerosis and plaque instability.

No abstract

Exosomes are small vesicles that contain diverse miRNA, mRNA, and proteins that are secreted by multiple cells, and play a vital function in cell–cell communication. Numerous exosomes produced by cells have been demonstrated to be protective against spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aims to investigate the neuroprotective effect of Schwann cells-derived exosomes (SCs-Exos) on spinal cord injury. We found that SCs-Exos can be taken directly by brain-derived endothelial cells.3 (bEnd.3 cells) and promoted to proliferate, migrate, and form bEnd.3 tube. Additionally, our results showed that the pro-angiogenesis molecules, Integrin-β1, were highly expressed in SCs-Exos. Moreover, we used special shRNA technology to investigate the role of Integrin-β1 in mediating the effect of SCs-Exos-induced angiogenesis on bEnd.3 cells. We observed that the pro-angiogenic effect of SCs-Exos on bEnd.3 cells was suppressed by inhibiting the expression of integrin-β1 in SCs-Exos. In the SCI model, we found that SCs-Exos attenuated tissue damage and improved functional recovery after SCI. Using immunofluorescence staining, we observed that SCs-Exos treatment promoted angiogenesis in SCI, and integrin-β1 was required to promote angiogenesis. In conclusion, our results indicate that SCs-Exos promote angiogenesis by delivering integrin-β1 and may serve as a promising novel therapeutic agent for enhancing neurological functional recovery after SCI.

No abstract

Background: It has been reported that drug-eluting stents (DES) were superior to intracoronary brachytherapy (ICBT) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). However, it is unknown whether there might be differences between DES and ICBT in terms of efficacy and safety in large sample size and long-term follow-up. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to determine whether DES implantation remains favorable in large sample size and long-term follow-up when compared with ICBT among patients with ISR. Methods: We conducted a search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials without language restrictions. A meta-analysis of 1942 cases from 12 controlled trials of DES vs ICBT for ISR was performed. Results: Drug-eluting stents were significantly more effective in reducing target-vessel revascularization (TVR) (odds ratio [OR]: 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.23-0.81, P = 0.009) and binary restenosis (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.26-0.46, P < 0.00001) compared with ICBT at midterm follow-up. There were no significant differences between DES and ICBT in cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), and late stent thrombosis at midterm follow-up. A statistical significance has been found between the 2 groups in TVR (OR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43-0.86, P = 0.005) at long-term follow-up. There were no significant differences in cardiac death and MI between the 2 groups at long-term follow-up. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence that DES is superior to ICBT for the treatment of ISR in TVR and binary restenosis reduction, but not in cardiac death, MI, and late stent thrombosis reduction. IntroductionIn-stent restenosis (ISR) occurs in 15%-50% of patients after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation and continues to be one of the most common adverse events. 1 Although drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly decreased the incidence of ISR, ISR remains a persistent, unresolved clinical issue, especially for patients with highly complex lesions.