The aim of this work has been to determine typical occupational dose levels in interventional radiology and cardiology installations and to relate doses to patient and occupational dosimetry through the dose-area product. An experimental correlation between environmental dosimetric records and dose-area products in the centres studied was established. The study covered a sample of 83 procedures performed by 10 specialists in six laboratories. The radiologists and cardiologists monitored wore nine thermoluminescent chips next to eyes, forehead, neck, hands, left shoulder, left forearm and left arm during each single procedure. In addition, direct reading electronic devices for environmental dosimetry were placed in the C-arm of the X-ray system, to estimate roughly the occupational radiation risk level. Typical shoulder doses derived from electronic dosimetry range between 300 and 500 muSv per procedure, assuming no lead protective screens were used. Using these values and patient dose-area data from two laboratories, averaged ratios of 84 and 120 muSv per 1000 cGy cm2 are obtained for cardiology procedures. Finally, occupational dose reductions of approximately 20% when using highly filtered X-ray beams with automatic tube potential (kV) reduction (available in some facilities), and by a factor of about three when using ceiling mounted screens, have been found.

Coronary angiography and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty procedures performed in four different facilities were monitored in the present study by measuring maximum skin dose, dose-area product and other operational parameters. Radiographic slow film, thermoluminescent dosemeters and transmission ion chambers were used to measure dose related quantities. Values of 107-711 mGy for maximum skin dose and 27.3-370.6 Gy cm2 for dose-area product were found, together with cumulative skin dose estimates of 110-3706 mGy. A discussion of the relationship of measured dose-area product and skin dose values is made using a field concentration factor defined as a way to interpret the findings. No general correlation was observed between dose-area product and maximum skin dose. Cumulative skin dose estimates throughout a procedure should be discarded as a realistic method for assessing deterministic risk in cardiology procedures. Slow film in addition to thermoluminescent dosemeters for measurement of maximum skin dose is a good alternative, especially for complex interventional procedures. For repeated procedures, combining film and dose-area product monitoring favours optimization of radiation protection for the patient.

Patient and staff dose values in an interventional cardiology laboratory for different operational modes and several patient thicknesses (from 16 to 28 cm, simulated using polymethylmethacrylate) are presented. When increasing patient thicknesses and depending on fluoroscopy and cine modes, occupational doses can increase >30 times the baseline level. Scatter dose rates at the cardiologist's position with no radiation protective tools ranged from 1 to 14 mSv h(-1) for fluoroscopy, and from 10 to 47 mSv h(-1) during cine acquisition. Patient entrance surface air kerma rates increased by nearly 3 and staff dose rates by up to 2.6 when fluoroscopy was moved from the low to the high mode, for a typical 20 cm thickness. The respective increase factors were 6 and 4.2 when patient thickness rose from 16 to 28 cm, and by 10 and 8.3, when comparing cine acquisition with the low fluoroscopy mode. The knowledge of typical dose rates for each X-ray system in use in catheterisation laboratories is essential in order to optimise protection of patients and staff.

The results of a survey of doses imparted on 41 patients undergoing hysterosalpingography is presented. Dosimetric evaluations were carried out by measuring both the dose-area product using a transmission ionization type chamber, and the entrance surface dose using thermoluminiscent dosimeters. As a result, a local reference dose value was obtained for this examination. Correlations between the dose-area product and the entrance surface dose data were analysed and compared in order to find the most appropriate dosimetric procedure. The median dose-area product obtained was 713 cGy cm2 (range 247 cGy cm2-1623 cGy cm2). Ovarian doses were also calculated, and a median value of 4.6 mGy was obtained for the whole examination. Effective doses were estimated with a median value of 3.1 mSv, and a range of 1.0 mSv-8.1 mSv.

No abstract