Patient prognosis in lung cancer largely depends on early diagnosis. The exhaled breath of patients may represent the ideal specimen for future lung cancer screening. However, the clinical applicability of current diagnostic sensor technologies based on signal pattern analysis remains incalculable due to their inability to identify a clear target. To test the robustness of the presence of a so far unknown volatile organic compound in the breath of patients with lung cancer, sniffer dogs were applied.Exhalation samples of 220 volunteers (healthy individuals, confirmed lung cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)) were presented to sniffer dogs following a rigid scientific protocol. Patient history, drug administration and clinicopathological data were analysed to identify potential bias or confounders.Lung cancer was identified with an overall sensitivity of 71% and a specificity of 93%. Lung cancer detection was independent from COPD and the presence of tobacco smoke and food odours. Logistic regression identified two drugs as potential confounders.It must be assumed that a robust and specific volatile organic compound (or pattern) is present in the breath of patients with lung cancer. Additional research efforts are required to overcome the current technical limitations of electronic sensor technologies to engineer a clinically applicable screening tool.
Lung cancer (LC) continues to represent a heavy burden for health care systems worldwide. Epidemiological studies predict that its role will increase in the near future. While patient prognosis is strongly associated with tumour stage and early detection of disease, no screening test exists so far. It has been suggested that electronic sensor devices, commonly referred to as 'electronic noses', may be applicable to identify cancer-specific volatile organic compounds in the breath of patients and therefore may represent promising screening technologies. However, three decades of research did not bring forward a clinically applicable device. Here, we propose a new research approach by involving specially trained sniffer dogs into research strategies by making use of their ability to identify LC in the breath sample of patients.
Our results suggest that ASA-PS is a strong predictor of morbidity among elderly patients considered for thoracoscopic lobectomy. Compared with elderly women, elderly men are particularly prone to postoperative pulmonary complications.
BackgroundAlbumin-glutaraldehyde glue gained a widespread acceptance in repair of superficial lung defects associated with alveolar air leaks (AAL). As its sealing efficacy has not yet been thoroughly corroborated by clinical studies, we sought to assess the properties of commercially available albumin-glutaraldehyde glue (BioGlue™) in an in vitro lung model.MethodsThe lower lobe of freshly excised swine lung (n = 10) was intubated and ventilated. A focal superficial parenchymal defect (40 × 25 mm) was created on the inflated lung. AAL was assessed with increasing inspired tidal volume (TVi). After glue application, AAL was assessed until burst failure occurred. To evaluate glue elasticity, the length of defect was recorded in the inflated lung.ResultsSuperficial parenchymal defects resulted in AAL increasing with ascending TVi. Multiple linear regression analysis revealed strong correlation between AAL and maximal inspiratory pressure. There was one application error. At TVi = 400, 500, 600, 700, 800 and 900 ml, BioGlue™ achieved complete sealing in nine, six, five, four two and one specimens, respectively. Mean burst pressure was 38.0 ± 4.2 cmH2O. All sealant failures were cohesive. BioGlue™ allowed an expansion of covered lung defects of 1.5 ± 1.7 mm.ConclusionsOur in vitro tests demonstrated a high sealing efficacy of BioGlue™ for repair of superficial lung defects. Due to the rigid nature, caution should be taken to use this kind of sealant in trapped lungs.
OBJECTIVES Despite the positive effects of a thoracoscopic approach on improving postoperative outcomes, the risk of major complications following thoracoscopic lobectomy is not negligible. We sought to assess the usefulness of the preoperative determination of serum biomarkers to refine risk stratification in this patient population. METHODS From 2009 to 2017, 626 patients (285 women, 341 men; median age: 67 years) underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy or anatomical segmentectomy for confirmed or suspected early-stage lung cancer or metastasis at our institution. Preoperative serum biomarkers, including albumin, C-reactive protein, haemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), were examined as predictors of postoperative cardiopulmonary complications using logistic regression analyses followed by causal inference. RESULTS The 90-day mortality, cardiopulmonary complication and overall morbidity rates were 1.0%, 13.1% and 18.1%, respectively. Although serum albumin, C-reactive protein and haemoglobin were not associated with cardiopulmonary complications in regression analyses, preoperative serum LDH level emerged as an independent morbidity predictor (odds ratio 1.008, 95% confidence interval 1.002–1.013; P = 0.006). The causal inference using the covariate balancing generalized propensity score methodology demonstrated similar results and an approximately positive linear relationship between the odds of cardiopulmonary complications and preoperative serum LDH level. For every 100 U/l increase in preoperative serum LDH, a 2-fold increase in the odds of cardiopulmonary complications was observed. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the preoperative serum LDH level is an independent predictor of 90-day cardiopulmonary complications following thoracoscopic lobectomy or segmentectomy, even in properly selected patients. Therefore, we recommend incorporating early serum LDH measurements as a readily available method into the risk assessment process prior to major lung resection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.