Legal certainty as proof of land rights, according to Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration and Government Regulation 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flats Units, and Land Registration, Legal certainty as proof of land rights is that there is a land registration process that guarantees legal certainty. The method used in this research is descriptive-analytical, with the main approach being normative juridical. Electronic registration, carried out by the Land Office based on Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, has been very helpful in registering land rights or updating data in the transfer of ownership. However, there are still many obstacles or problems due to human error, such as a lack of Human Resources who are not ready and servers that often experience trouble or difficulties, thus complicating and hindering the land registration process. There must be coordination at all levels in the land registration process at the land office, where the land registration system is crucial for the validity of the documents to avoid overlapping ownership evidence, causing legal uncertainty. The land registration system in Indonesia should adhere to the principle of positive publicity with positive tendencies.

This research focuses on the criminal liability of notaries affiliated with banking institutions for the guarantee binding act in the form of a deposit connected to the principle of bank secrecy in Indonesia. Through the analysis of relevant laws, including Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 2 of 2000, Notary Position Law, and Bank Confidentiality Law, the study aims to answer two research questions: the form of criminal liability of notaries affiliated with banking institutions for the guarantee binding act and the ideal concept of criminal liability. The findings suggest that notaries who breach the principle of bank secrecy can face criminal charges, and the ideal concept of criminal liability should balance the interests of customers and banking institutions while maintaining bank secrecy and customer privacy. The study's implications call for clear guidelines and regulations for notaries' responsibilities in guaranteeing binding acts related to deposits and penalties for notaries who violate the principle of bank secrecy.

<p align="justify">One of these systems outsourcing, in practice often raises the pros and cons even cause problems. The problem is why research in the outsourcing agreement must have harmony with the principles of contract law? and how legal protection for workers/laborers and employers in the outsourcing agreement with the labor Law No. 13 Year 2003 on Employment associated with Court Decision No. 27/PUU-IX/2011?. This research methods using empirical juridical normative juridical supported/sociological and comparative law. Commonly used secondary data. Based on the results of analysis show that the employment agreement outsourcing based on the principle of freedom of contract and the principle of the deal. Each of these parties do not have equal bargaining power, so it does not provide legal protection for workers/laborers. Preparation and implementation of the outsourcing agreement is based on the alignment of the entire principle or principles that exist in the law of contract, is a unity, without prioritizing or separating principle that one with the other principles and serve as the frame of the treaty.</p>

Legal protection for workers in the labor outsourcing system in Indonesia as part of the industrial relations system is generally still a big problem, because outsourcing is still considered exploitation. The issue of work relations norms in the outsourcing system, namely the existence of gaps and differences in the sense of justice and discriminatory treatment in terms of rewards, salary and punishment in the same workplace. This research method is a normative juridical legal research where the source of legal materials is mainly secondary legal materials, consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In addition, it is supported by primary legal materials in order to strengthen these secondary legal materials. Analysis of legal materials through qualitative juridical analysis methods. The results showed that the basic rights of workers with a certain time work agreement were lost after the enactment of the Omnibus Law on Cipta Kerja, the provisions of the Manpower Act were revised. However, the revision no longer confirms the existence of outsourcing systems, but instead regulates that the norms of work relations between outsourcing companies and their employees are agreed and written. In addition, there are additional conditions that further strengthen the argument for outsourcing work, which can be promised through a work agreement for a certain period of time. Outsourced workers make it impossible to form and become members of a trade union, and automatically other derivative rights cannot be realized, especially those that require a labor union. Likewise, rights related to working and rest periods, such as the right to annual leave and long rest. In addition, rights regarding wages, both during the employment relationship, and after the end of the employment relationship, cannot be obtained.