Bipartite negotiations are an effort to resolve disputes that the parties must take in advance, as mandated in Article 3 of Law Number 2 of 2004. Suppose there is an agreement in bipartite negotiations. In that case, these agreements are written into a collective contract that is then registered with an industrial relations court to obtain a registration certificate. However, collective agreements that have been agreed upon and registered and have executorial legal force are still being sued by one of the court parties. The purpose of this study is to obtain an overview and analyze the concept of procedural law regarding the implementation of collective agreements with legal certainty in terminating employment in Indonesia. This research is legal research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach—the collection of material through the literature study method, with primary and secondary legal materials. Furthermore, the traditional fabric is studied and analyzed by the approaches used in this study to answer legal issues in this study. In this article, the author offers 2 (two) procedural law concepts regarding the implementation of collective agreements. First, a lawsuit for disputes that have been resolved through a cooperative agreement may not be accepted by the court, and the judge does not need to process the case further. Still, a file research process is sufficient to explore the main problem of the parties, if the problem is related to one of the parties breaking the promise by referring to the recorded evidence issued by the same court, the Panel of Judges is sufficient to hold a deliberation and only determine with a single judge that the case has been resolved and choose the order for execution. The second concept is that the lawsuit is still being processed. Still, it is only continued until the interim decision stage if, at the initial examination stage, it is known that the dispute has been resolved through a collective agreement. This is far more effective, efficient and fair, and provides legal certainty for the parties.

Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (Kejaksaan) sebagai institusi penegakan hukum merupakan salah satu unsur penting di dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Sebagai bagian dari struktur hukum dalam sebuah sistem hukum. Kejaksaan R.I. adalah lembaga negara yang melaksanakan kekuasaan negara, khususnya di bidang penuntutan. Sebagai badan yang berwenang dalam penegakan hukum dan keadilan, Kejaksaan dipimpin oleh Jaksa Agung yang dipilih oleh dan bertanggung jawab kepada Presiden. Kejaksaan Agung, Kejaksaan Tinggi, dan Kejaksaan Negeri merupakan kekuasaan negara khususnya dibidang penuntutan, dimana semuanya merupakan satu kesatuan yang utuh yang tidak dapat dipisahkan. Oleh karena itu sangat butuh budaya organisasi agar terbentuk satu kesatuan yang kuat sehingga kejaksaan bisa maksimal dalam melakukan tugas.

No abstract

A constitution is a collective agreement as the foundation and goal to be achieved in the state. Therefore, the constitution not only regulates the fundamental rules of the state but also contains the ethical values that serve as the guiding of the state administrator. However, the spreading of violations of law such as corruption, abuse of authority that ends in the imposition of sanctions justifies the occurrence of incompatibility between the values of the constitutional principle as a reflection of the soul of the nation with the moral obligation of state administrator to implement the values. Using a doctrinal approach, data will be analyzed through the original intent of interpretation, grammatical and systematic law is expected to formulate a new model of constitutional ethics for state administrator based on the value of “Pancasila.” Based on the study of moral and constitutional philosophy with the law interpretation method can be concluded that the ethical values in the 1945 Constitution requires that state administrator base their deeds on the moral deity who respects the values of human civilization as Indonesian citizens, and humans in general with the priority of Indonesian unity above all interests and classes in order to achieve the ideals of social justice based on a deliberate-oriented on the great goal of Indonesian independence. To achieve this intention, the formation of ethical standards of the administrator in the constitutional norms through the amendment of the 1945 Constitution which then set a further law which is general and contains normative sanctions. Keywords: Redesign, Constitutional Ethics, State Administrator

ABSTRAK Sejak diberlakukannya Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia telah melakukan upaya-upaya perlindungan lingkungan hidup secara represif melalui mekanisme gugatan perdata, khususnya terhadap kerusakan dan Kebakaran Hutan dan Lahan (Karhutla). Dalam kurun waktu 2009-2019, tercatat terdapat 15 perkara yang diajukan oleh pemerintah ke pengadilan. Upaya pemerintah tersebut telah menghasilkan putusan yang mewajibkan perusahaan untuk membayar sejumlah ganti kerugian dengan nilai yang signifikan. Tulisan ini melakukan analisis terhadap perspesi hakim terkait dengan valuasi kerusakan lingkungan hidup. Analisis dilakukan untuk melihat persoalan-persoalan hukum yang diperdebatkan di dalam perkara putusan tersebut, dan bagaimana hakim di dalam putusannya menyelesaikan persoalan hukum tersebut. Dengan menggunakan metode empiris normatif dalam melakukan analisa terhadap putusan dari perkara tersebut, tulisan ini menemukan 2 (dua) persoalan hukum, yakni: penerapan prinsip tanggung jawab mutlak dan perhitungan kerugian kerusakan lingkungan hidup. Kata kunci: gugat perdata lingkungan; kebakaran hutan dan lahan; kerusakan lingkungan hidup; valuasi kerugian lingkungan hidup. ABSTRACT Since the enactment of Law Number 32 Year 2009 on Protection and Management of the Environment. The Indonesian Government has conducted a series of repressive measure to protect environment through civil litigation against polluters. The majority of litigation process have been done against polluters who caused damages to the forest and land ecosystem. Between 2009-2019, the government sued 15 companies to the civil court. The government effort resulted in substantial amount of damage award for the government. The analysis focuses on the legal issues in application of damage valuation applied by judges in those decisions. The analysis employs empirical approach to analyses the court decisions, and found two legal issues on the application, namely, the application of strict liability and the method in valuing the environmental damages. Keywords: environmental damages valuation; environmental civil litigation; environmental damages; land and forest fire.