Abortion or abortus provokatus constitutes a termination of pregnancy before the time of delivery. The objective of the study is to ascertain if the Abortion-related Health Law is a realistic rule based on the health aspects, as well as to analyze how long it should be allowed by the Health Law to perform an abortion according to medical criteria. The study uses a method of normative legal research. It concludes that the Health Law pertaining abortion is a realistic rule based on health aspects. Yet, it  is necessary to revise the abortion rules due to rape incidents. The rules permits the abortion if the gestational age is 6 (six) weeks or 40 (forty) days. It is calculated from the first day of the last period. It suggests that the gestational age should be 12 (twelve) weeks or 3 (three) months from the first day of the last period.   Keywords: Abortus Provocatus, Legal Protection, Rape Victims

The ease and sophistication of technology is used as a loophole for illegal persons to carry out their crimes against the personal data of fintech users so that this problem must be positioned as an urgency of legal protection for the privacy rights of each individual. This incident is also supported by the Covid-19 pandemic because all activities must be carried out online. With these problems, this study aims to determine the legal effectiveness of personal data protection in Indonesia and the resolution of the urgency of online crime against the personal data of fintech users. The results of this study indicate that the Indonesian government has not fully realized this crucial theme so that the protection of personal data cannot be carried out optimally by law enforcement officers. Therefore, this research will focus on a description of the importance of personal data protection in Indonesia, the forms of online crimes committed by illegal fintechs, and the resolution of the urgency that arises in the protection of personal data.

Penyebaran Covid-19 mempengaruhi kestabilan ekonomi suatu negara. Indonesia merupakan salah satu negara yang kestabilan ekononominya terganggu akibat penyebaran Covid-19. Maka, dibutuhkan kolaborasi seluruh elemen sebagai upaya bersama dalam proses peningkatan kesejahteraan dan kualitas hidup masyarakat, salah satunya adalah peran perusahaan. Perusahaan dinilai memiliki peran penting dalam pertumbuhan ekonomi serta mengentaskan kemiskinan selama pandemi ini. Maka, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui serta mengkaji eksistensi pengaturan CSR di Indonesia dan upaya perusahaan dalam pengembangan masyarakat selama Pandemi Covid-19. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa di Indonesia pengaturan CSR belum diatur secara utuh sehingga dinilai tidak jelas dan tidak konsisten. Hal ini mengakibatkan kurangnya kepastian hukum sehingga dibutuhkan regulasi yang jelas dan konsisten agar tidak menimbulkan multitafsir atau interpretasi yang berbeda mengenai CSR. Dimasa Pandemi Covid-19 saat ini CSR dapat diimplementasikan oleh perusahaan sebagi upaya pengembangan masyarakat melalui program pemberdayaan. Kebijakan CSR setiap perusahaan tentunya perlu melalui strategi yang telah disesuaikan dengan potensi dan lingkungan masyarakat.

As a country blessed with abundant cultural elements, Indonesia holds the potential to harness traditional knowledge for the betterment of its people's lives. Unfortunately, this concept is often forgotten within Indonesian society and faces various challenges that jeopardize cultural heritage. Hence, the objective of this study is to analyze the significance of traditional knowledge and the legal hurdles that arise in regulating this concept within Indonesia's intellectual property rights framework. The findings of this normative legal research demonstrate that traditional knowledge holds great importance for Indonesian society, particularly amidst the accelerating impacts of globalization, which pose a threat to cultural heritage. Taking a legislative approach, there is an urgent need for a normative framework to protect traditional knowledge as a communal intellectual asset in order to realize the implicit recognition reflected in the constitution, the 1945 Constitution.