Drinking water, water used in food production and for irrigation, water for fish farming, waste water, surface water, and recreational water have been recently recognized as a vector for the transmission of pathogenic Escherichia coli, especially serotype O157:H7. We investigated the UV (253.7 nm) inactivation behavior and the capability of dark repair (liquid-holding recovery) and photoreactivation of seven pathogenic (including three enterohemorrhagic E. coli) strains and one nonpathogenic strain of E. coli (ATCC 11229) with respect to the use of UV light for water disinfection purposes. Because most bacteria and yeast are known to be able to repair UV damage in their nucleic acids, repair mechanisms have to be considered to ensure safe water disinfection. We found a wide divergence in the UV susceptibility within the strains tested. A 6-log reduction of bacteria that fulfills the requirement for safe water disinfection was reached for the very most susceptible strain O157:H7 (CCUG 29199) at a UV fluence of 12 J/m2, whereas for the most resistant strain, O25:K98:NM, a UV fluence of about 125 J/m2 was needed. Except for one strain (O50:H7) liquid-holding recovery did not play an important role in recovery after UV irradiation. By contrast, all strains, particularly strains O25:K98:NM, O78:K80:H12, and O157:H7 (CCUG 29193), demonstrated photorepair ability. For a 6-log reduction of these strains, a UV fluence (253.7 nm) up to 300 J/m2 is required. The results reveal that the minimum fluence of 400 J/m2 demanded in the Austrian standard for water disinfection is sufficient to inactivate pathogenic E. coli. A fluence of 160 J/m2 (recommendation in Norway) or 250 J/m2 (recommendation in Switzerland) cannot be regarded as safe in that respect.

The microbicidal effect of UV light depends on the dose in both, disinfection processes and natural inactivation by the sunlight in surface water. Deviations of the time dose reciprocity are well known from chemical water disinfection whereas no data are available about this effect in UV inactivation in water. In a previous study we found that the UV inactivation behaviour of yeast strains does not follow the time dose reciprocity, insofar that longer exposure led to higher reduction of cultivable cells. In contrast, an earlier study about E coli B/r claimed a higher inactivation with single exposure compared with fractionated UV irradiation. To investigate this question we selected water-relevant microorganisms and studied their UV inactivation behaviour (253.7nm) by means of a specially designed UV irradiation apparatus (a) under standard irradiation conditions (2W/m2) and (b) with three levels of UV dose rate (2, 0.2 and 0.02W/m2). The test organisms were (i) three E coli strains (ATCC 25922, ATCC 11229 and an isolate from sewage) representing the routinely used faecal indicator, (ii) three bacterial viruses (MS2, ϕX174 and B40-8) proposed as indicators for viral contamination in water and (iii) spores of Bacillus subtilis because of their use as a biodosimeter in prototype testing of commercial UV plants for drinking water disinfection. We found, under standard inactivation conditions, that the E coli strains and phage ϕX174 are most UV susceptible, followed by B40-8 and finally MS2 and bacterial spores. The dose protraction experiments revealed for the E coli strains a higher inactivation with high dose rates compared to low dose rates at the same UV doses (difference of about 1 log10 at 80-100J/m2). The other test organisms did not deviate from the time dose reciprocity in the proven range of dose.

No abstract

No abstract