This article assesses the status of diversity education in 2008–2009 in both accredited and non-accredited journalism and mass communication programs in U.S. colleges and universities. Using survey responses from 105 academic programs, findings support earlier studies that found the number of special courses on media diversity is increasing steadily. Findings also identify a preference for integrating diversity content across the curriculum. Among factors pushing these improvements are accreditation standards and an increasing multicultural environment.

This comparison of news frames found mainstream newspaper coverage of the 2010 health care reform was largely politically focused, while a significant part of the Latino online newspaper coverage reflected the reform details and their implications for Latinos.

Using content analysis method and the theory of framing, this study compares news coverage of climate issues around the Paris Climate Conference 2015, also known as “COP21”, between U.S. and Indian newspapers. The findings, based on an analysis of 278 stories published by four leading newspapers in these countries, suggest that international politics-oriented conflict and strategy frame and environmental consequences frame dominated both U.S. and Indian newspaper coverage. Another important finding of this study is the Indian newspaper coverage, compared to the U.S. newspaper coverage, included more information on social progress and innovations toward environment-friendly initiatives.

No abstract

This study measures the significance of factors used by minority students in their selection of universities/colleges. This web survey was conducted mainly on 778 students enrolled in journalism/mass communication courses representing five historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and twelve other universities. Differences were found among and between criteria favored by students of various ethnicities, minority, and majority students at public and private universities, and students at HBCUs and their counterparts at white majority institutions. Two factors, a university’s academic reputation and the availability of financial assistance, emerged as most important among all respondents. Beyond that, however, the survey found differences between majority and minority students, for example, in their rankings of the presence of minority faculty and intercollegiate athletic programs, among others.