No abstract

This paper treats methodological issues involved in assessing linguistic competence in the field, specifically in bilingual fieldwork situations. First, the various means of assessment of linguistic competence that have been described and=or used are listed and commented on. Then the authors explain the choice of assessment methods for fieldwork in the Slovene minority region of Austria: among other fieldwork tests, self-assessments of two different kinds (more general and situation-specific selfassessments) were combined with third-party assessments of taped storytelling. The specific fieldwork methodology and assessment methods are described. The results that bear on methodology suggest that self-assessments of linguistic competence are unreliable; that fieldworkers should pay attention to the kind of linguistic competence they wish to characterise; and, when storytelling proficiency testing is used, that different types of storytelling tasks should be employed.

No abstract

During fieldwork in the Slovene-minority area of Austrian Carinthia in 1998–2000, over two hundred informants were interviewed in six localities. The interviews were designed to elicit three types of data: (i) language use in social networks, (ii) subjective perceptions of “ethnolinguistic vitality”, and (iii) linguistic competence in Standard Slovene and Standard Austrian German. The three parameters were expected to correlate with each other. This article describes the questionnaire, scoring and analysis, and demonstrates that the three parameters of attitudes, social networks, and linguistic competence are indeed correlated with each other. Several specific conclusions are reported with regard to the factors which are involved in Slovene language-maintenance in Austria.