Abstract. Dynamic branch predictor logic alone accounts for approximately 10% of total processor power dissipation. Recent research indicates that the power cost of a large dynamic branch predictor is offset by the power savings created by its increased accuracy. We describe a method of reducing dynamic predictor power dissipation without degrading prediction accuracy by using a combination of local delay region scheduling and run time profiling of branches. Feedback into the static code is achieved with hint bits and avoids the need for dynamic prediction for some individual branches. This method requires only minimal hardware modifications and coexists with a dynamic predictor.
Abstract-Dynamic branch predictors account for between 10% and 40% of a processor's dynamic power consumption. This power cost is proportional to the number of accesses made to that dynamic predictor during a program's execution. In this paper we propose the combined use of local delay region scheduling and profiling with an original adaptive branch bias measurement. The adaptive branch bias measurement takes note of the dynamic predictor's accuracy for a given branch and decides whether or not to assign a static prediction for that branch. The static prediction and local delay region scheduling information is represented as two hint bits in branch instructions. We show that, with the combined use of these two methods, the number of dynamic branch predictor accesses/updates can be reduced by up to 62%. The associated average power saving is very encouraging; for the example high-performance embedded architecture n average global processor power saving of 6.22% is achieved.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.