This study aims to know the legal thoughts in measuring the strength of qiyas as the methodology of Jurisprudence of zakat in Indonesia. This research is a qualitative research based on the literature. The results of this study indicate the existence of the fact that the minds that developed visible: First, to support that qiyas is the legal argument including to adopt about the law of prison in Indonesia, this opinion raised by Jumhur ulama especially Imam Syafii who has provided enough space to the existence of qiyas. Secondly, the thought of rejecting qiyas as an argument of Islamic law, this opinion was expressed by the Mu'tazilites, the Zahiriyya and the Imami Shi'ah rejected the use of qiyas absolutely. Thirdly, the group that does not place qiyas as a proposition but qiyas is placed as a method of ijtihad, this opinion put forward by Imam al-Ghazali, Abu Zahrah and Ahmad Hasan. Fourth, the Group of contemporary minds especially developed in Indonesia, such as Hasbi Ash-Shiddieqy and others that qiyas within the boundaries of al-Syafi'i cannot meet the needs because the search process illat so complicated and rigid. Fifth, keterbatasn qiyas in adopting the law of prison in Indonesia lies only to see illat that is naqliyah (nash) means illat which is based on the provisions of texts.

One of the Government's strategic policies in suppressing and stopping the transmission of COVID-19 is to take the vaccination movement seriously. Even though the vaccination program has a positive aim, while people have doubt and even refuse to use vaccines because they are considered illegal and dangerous. Responding to this friction, this is where the importance of the MUI fatwa in socializing that vaccination is very urgent and allowed to be carried out. There is no serious objection to vaccination in Medan City; even most Medan Muslims claim that the MUI fatwa brings benefits. This article belongs to field research with a qualitative approach. The methodology used is an interpretive study of the sociology of law by conducting interviews and reviewing documents related to the MUI fatwa on COVID-19 vaccination. The result concluded that; the MUI fatwa in Medan City has been well received by the community and is considered necessary. Second, the effectiveness of the halal Sinovac vaccine has been tested and is of good quality and is allowed to use. There is no severe objection regarding vaccination in Medan City; even most Medan Muslims claim that the MUI fatwa brings benefits.

This study aims to find the problems and strategies carried out by the Lazis Muhammadiyah management in Medan are divided into two, namely internal and external. And what is being done is an effort to raise awareness together to channel zakat al-mal to Lazis Muhammadiyah so that it is managed properly and transparently and evenly so that it directly touches the community so that the objectives of the zakat law are realized. Management of zakat based on Law Number 23 of 2011 is zakat management states that zakat management aims to increase the effectiveness and efficiency of services in managing zakat; and increase the benefits of zakat to create social welfare and poverty alleviation. Efforts to realize the function and role of zakat in the welfare of society, the zakat management law issued by the government is in principle to facilitate, motivate and confirm the management of zakat issued by the Amil Zakat Agency or the Amil Zakat Institute.

This research aims to analyze the resolution of ḥaḍānah conflicts through litigation, specifically the decisions of the Sharia Court in Aceh regarding child custody (ḥaḍānah) to find legal certainty. This research uses a normative-empirical type of research by integrating normative law and empirical law. Normative legal analysis is carried out by examining library archives or secondary data. This research uses laws and judges' decisions in ḥaḍānah cases at the Aceh Syariah Courts. The instruments used in collecting data are observation, interviews, and documents or literature studies. To obtain research data on the number of ḥaḍānah cases that were filed separately at the Sharia Court, the article draws on existing decisions starting from 2016-2021. In this research, 5 (five) Sharia Courts were taken as research samples with 32 ḥaḍānah cases, particularly the Sharia Courts in Langsa, Kuala Simpang, Idi, Jantho, and Takengon. The research applies the theory of legal objectives according to Gustav Radbruch: legal certainty, justice, and expediency. The research shows that legal certainty through the decision of the Sharia Court has been realized. However, this has not provided justice for children because many defendants have not complied with court decisions, especially the surrender of child custody according to court decisions and payment of monthly child support according to what has been decided by the court. Hence, the benefits of the court decisions on the ḥaḍānah case are still not maximized. The solution is to formulate a law that is capable of providing a deterrent effect for defendants unwilling to fulfill court compliance.

This research is collaborative research of library research and field research. Using a qualitative method with a normative legal approach, namely Islamic law (usul fiqh) and naturalistic phenomena. Research exploring the existence of Regional Regulations (Perda) on Zakat Management in Medan City is a necessity, to explore the potential for greater zakat, but the Perda in question has not yet been legislated. The many inhibiting factors, two factors need attention in this study, namely: First, the paradigm of the Muslim community in the city of Medan towards the Syafii fiqh legal methodology is since the majority of Muslims are based on the Syafii fiqh school, thus denying other legal methodologies such as Maqashid al-Syariah which are quite relevant to strengthening the zakat regulation. Second, the paradigm of the Muslim community in the city of Medan has not seen the urgency of Maqashid al-Syariahal-Syatibi as an element of strengthening the regional regulation on zakat in Medan City. The results of the study show that: First, the Muslim community of Medan city does not yet know and fully understand Maqashid al-Syariah al-Syatibi as a legal methodology, because of the strong and strong Syafii school of jurisprudence as a single majority school. Second, Maqashid al-Syariah al-Syatibi is urgent as a solution to strengthening the regional regulation on zakat in the city of Medan with the substance of high benefit aspects, starting from the position of regulation, management to positive benefits for the Muslim community in the city of Medan