Traditional health services in Indonesia have been regulated in the legislation, namely in Law no. 36 of 2009. It is about health and has been regulated more detail in Government Regulation no. 103 of 2014. The regulation determines that traditional health services are divided into three types: empirical, complementary and integration. However, there is a difference in the right between traditional and complementary empirical health services and integration, so the degree of legal protection is different. This study uses normative juridical methods. The results of the study indicate that the level of legal protection against empirical traditional health services is lower than complementary and integrated. This is evidenced by the absence of the right to obtain legal protection for traditional empirical health services and the legality of traditional empirical health services is only evidenced by the Registered Traditional Hygiene  while complementary and integration are evidenced by the Registration Letter of Traditional Health License and Practice License Traditional Health Workers.   Keywords: Rights and Legality; Traditional Health Services; Legal protection   Abstrak Pelayanan kesehatan tradisional di Indonesia telah diatur dalam tataran undang-undang, yakni dalam Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan dan diatur secara lebih rinci dalam Peraturan Pemerintah No. 103 Tahun 2014. Peraturan tersebut menentukan bahwa pelayanan kesehatan tradisional dibagi menjadi tiga jenis, yakni: empiris, komplementer dan integrasi. Akan tetapi, terdapat perbedaan dalam hak antara pelayanan kesehatan tradisional empiris dengan komplementer dan integrasi, sehingga tingkat perlindungan hukumnya menjadi berbeda. Penelitian ini menggunaan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat perlindungan hukum terhadap pelayanan kesehatan tradisional empiris lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan komplementer dan integrasi. Hal tersebut dibuktikan dengan tidak adanya hak memperoleh perlindungan hukum bagi pelayanan kesehatan tradisional empiris dan legalitas pelayanan kesehatan tradisional empiris hanya dibuktikan dengan Surat Terdaftar Penyehat Tradisional (STPT) sedangkan komplementer dan integrasi dibuktikan dengan Surat Tanda Registrasi Tenaga Kesehatan Tradisional (STRTKT) dan Surat Izin Praktik Tenaga Kesehatan Tradisional (SIPTKT).   Kata kunci: Hak dan Legalitas; Pelayanan Kesehatan Tradisional; Perlindungan Hukum

Begal, a criminal action in Banyumas committed by offenders with violent and new operandi mode create unrest in society. Critical problem lies in the lack of a comprehensive approach in the science of criminology and victimology approach to find the root of the cause and countermeasures consistently correlated with the cause. This study used a qualitative sociologic juridical approach. The focus of the study are the factors that influence the occurrence of crime robber, and mitigation in Banyumas Police, which is done by using the approach of criminology, victimology and police functions. Factors that influence the occurrence of crime robber in Banyumas Police in criminology perspective is the economic factor, social environmental offender, the crime scene as possible, the impersonation of evil robber in other regions (including the role of the media), and the persistence of the fence. As in the perspective of victimology is a behavioral factor victim, victim's biological and psychological weaknesses, and situation. Begal crime prevention that has been done in Banyumas Police comprehensive enough that prevention is pre-emptive, preventive and repersif. However, there are still some obstacles in its implementation so that the expected duties and functions of the police in tackling crime needs to be improved.

Each year, environmental pollution and damage is always increasing and tends to be out of control. The use of administrative and civil sanctions is considered ineffective, however to implement criminal sanctions is still difficult. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the regulation of criminal offense in Law No. 32 of 2009, factors that influence the enforcement of environmental crime, and the projection of enforcement of environmental crime in the Criminal Code Bill. The research showed that in Law no. 32 of 2009 some offense formulated as material offenses and some others constituted formal offenses, some provisions were formulated in ultimum remedium, and a small part in primum remedium. There are factors that influence law enforcement of environmental crime which actually becomes a weakening factor in terms of legal structure, legal subtance and legal structure. However, the legal substance of the Criminal Code Bill may weaken enforcement of environmental criminal law in the future.

<div><table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" align="left"><tbody><tr><td align="left" valign="top"><p class="AbstractText">Cybercrime has resulted in astronomical losses for the business community. However, the reactive policy model must be more effective at preventing cybercrime, and the due process model is also inappropriate for combating cybercrime with a high level of speed and mobility. This study is normative legal research employing a conceptual strategy and case studies. The results indicate that the reactive model must be improved in order to prevent cybercrime. The model of due process is not appropriate for deterring cybercrime with a high degree of speed and mobility. The preventative law enforcement strategy is effective, but it requires a high level of law enforcement capability to detect and disable cybercrime, which is something that few Indonesian law enforcement officials possess. Prevention based on the user, which places responsibility on internet users, is fine for individuals but not for businesses. Based on collaboration between corporations, universities, civic society, and non-governmental groups, the collaborative model synthesizes the aforementioned paradigms. Because they are based on plans or roadmaps created by internet stakeholders, regulations, technical aspects, and law enforcement may be effectively implemented and developed.</p></td></tr></tbody></table></div>

Legal aid distribution at the moment does not yet reach the whole Indonesian people because existing limitations for the implementation of the law so that paralegal is required to increase the range of legal aid. Considering the importance of that, it is needed to legitimation for a paralegal position in enforcement law for optimizing the role of the paralegal. The aim of this study is to knowing the importance and legitimacy of paralegal position in regulations legislation in Indonesia and to knowing optimization of the position and role of paralegals in enforcement law through legal aid. The method research used is juridical normative with approach statute, analysis, and concepts. Research results show that reason that is a consequence of the rule of law adopted by Indonesia and is a right constitutional as well as a protection right basic as equality before the law, setting more carry on of legal aid regulation, as aspect obligations and state responsibilities in giving legal aid, guarantee certainty for paralegal law in operating their duties, and as the effort for creating order in organizing giver legal aid especially paralegals. Optimization of paralegals’ position in the enforcement of Indonesian law in giving legal aid could be conducted through increasing paralegal competence with follow the training, networking, and cadre of paralegals from start district level, regional until lowest in the village, Skill advocate Public in the form of defense and support to the community, and giving law protection for paralegals in operating their job in giving legal aid.