No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

"The Colonial Fortune" highlights the features of a paracolonial aesthetics emanating from a significant body of contemporary Hexagonal and non-metropolitan texts. Authored by writers who are either directly involved in the debate about the colonial past and its remanence (J. M. G. Le Clézio, Paule Constant, Édouard Glissant, Tierno Monénembo, Marie NDiaye, and Leïla Sebbar) or who do not overtly manifest such concerns (Stéphane Audeguy, Marie Darrieussecq, Régis Jauffret, Pierre Michon, and Claude Simon), these works create a shared imaginary space permeated by the symbolic, rhetorical, and conceptual presence of colonialism in our postcolonial era. The paracolonial describes the phenomena of revival, resurgence, remanence, and residue – in other words, the permanence of the colonial in contemporary imagination. It also addresses the re-imagining, revisiting, and recasting of the colonial in current works of literature (fiction, autobiography, and essay). The idea of the colonial fortune emerges as an interface between our era’s concerns with issues of fate, economics, legacy, and debt stemming from the understudied persistence of the colonial in today’s political and cultural conversation, and literature’s ways of making sense of them both sensorially and sensibly.

Résumé S’appuyant sur la contemporanéité historique et esthétique des univers romanesques de Jean Echenoz et de Patrick Chamoiseau, l’article examine d’abord l’attitude des deux écrivains à l’égard la fiction et de la catégorie générique du roman ainsi que la place que celui-ci occupe dans le cadre des tentatives récentes de revalorisation de la littérature. L’analyse procède ensuite à cerner les particularités rhétoriques et formelles de deux poétiques romanesques contemporaines — les poétiques de récupération et les poétiques de créolisation — et à souligner leurs lignes de partage.