to investigate the current mechanism for appeals against the decision of the competitive selection commissions of economic entities' heads in the state sector of economy as a type of a public-legal dispute and to express an opinion on the regulation of these relations in Ukraine. Research methods: general-scientific and special-legal methods of scientific knowledge, in particular: system-structural and functional methods, method of observation, method of generalization, methods of analysis and synthesis have been applied. Results: the current normative regulation of the procedure for appeals against the decision of the competitive selection commissions of economic entities' heads in the state sector of economy as a type of a public-legal dispute has been analyzed and the judicial practice has been assessed. Discussion: there is a significant lack of scientific research on appeals against the decision of the competitive selection commissions of economic entities' heads in the state sector of economy as a type of a public-legal dispute. This issue has not been considered in many aspects, and various objective indicators have not been taken into account, so the level of research on the theme is low. This is due to the novelty of this theme, as appeals against the decisions of competitive commissions in the public (administrative) process are from the beginning of 2020. Previously, this type of relations was considered only in the context of civil law.
The relevance of the researched problem is conditioned by the civilizational need of globalization entry of Ukraine in the European and world community with further reforming of its system of state administration in the financial sphere. The purpose of the article is based on the study of current world experience and the consequences of budget federalization as a phenomenon, analysis of the current reform situation in Ukraine and the development of useful recommendations for further approbation. The basic method is comparative, which allowed to compare different state and legal systems, in order to identify similarities or differences between them, resulting in a qualitative state of the legal system as a whole and individual legal institution. This allowed us to consider the problem in a holistic manner and from every side. The article analyzes the policy and experience 635