Some of the most intense solar flares measured in 0.1 to 0.8 nm x‐rays in recent history occurred near the end of 2003. The Nov 4 event is the largest in the NOAA records (X28) and the Oct 28 flare was the fourth most intense (X17). The Oct 29 flare was class X7. These flares are compared and contrasted to the July 14, 2000 Bastille Day (X10) event using the SOHO SEM 26.0 to 34.0 nm EUV and TIMED SEE 0.1–194 nm data. High time resolution, ∼30s ground‐base GPS data and the GUVI FUV dayglow data are used to examine the flare‐ionosphere relationship. In the 26.0 to 34.0 nm wavelength range, the Oct 28 flare is found to have a peak intensity greater than twice that of the Nov 4 flare, indicating strong spectral variability from flare‐to‐flare. Solar absorption of the EUV portion of the Nov 4 limb event is a possible cause. The dayside ionosphere responds dramatically (∼2.5 min 1/e rise time) to the x‐ray and EUV input by an abrupt increase in total electron content (TEC). The Oct 28 TEC ionospheric peak enhancement at the subsolar point is ∼25 TECU (25 × 1012 electrons/cm2) or 30% above background. In comparison, the Nov 4, Oct 29 and the Bastille Day events have ∼5–7 TECU peak enhancements above background. The Oct 28 TEC enhancement lasts ∼3 hrs, far longer than the flare duration. This latter ionospheric feature is consistent with increased electron production in the middle altitude ionosphere, where recombination rates are low. It is the EUV portion of the flare spectrum that is responsible for photoionization of this region. Further modeling will be necessary to fully understand the detailed physics and chemistry of flare‐ionosphere coupling.
The launch of the Defense Meteorological Satellite Program (DMSP) satellite F16 in 2003 provided the first opportunity to analyze extensive sets of high‐quality coincident auroral particle and FUV data obtained by the onboard sensors Special Sensor Ultraviolet Spectrographic Imager (SSUSI) and Special Sensor Auroral Particle Sensor (SSJ/5). Features of interest are Ly α (121.6 nm), Lyman‐Birge‐Hopfield short (LBHS, the SSUSI 140–150 nm channel), and Lyman‐Birge‐Hopfield long (LBHL, 165–180 nm). We report on comparisons of column emission rates (CERs) by deriving simulated SSUSI values using SSJ/5 electron and ion (treated as proton) spectra. Field‐line tracing is performed to determine the locations of coincidences. CERs are obtained by integrating the products of particle spectra and monoenergetic emission yields. A technique is reported for deriving these yields from nonmonoenergetic CERs obtained by our particle transport model. SSJ/5 ion spectra are extrapolated above 30 keV using a statistical representation based on Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellites particle data. Key quantities of interest are ratios of SSUSI to SSJ/5‐based CERs (S‐S ratios) and corresponding ratios of proton‐produced to total emission (unity for Ly α and from 0 to 1 for LBHS and LBHL). SSJ/5‐based CERs are used to derive the latter ratios. Median ratio values are determined in order to reduce the error budget to primarily calibration and model errors. The median LBH S‐S ratios increase by a factor of ∼2.5 from electron to proton aurora and support significantly higher proton LBH emission efficiencies (3 times the electron efficiencies) assuming reported calibration uncertainties. This calls for significant increases in proton and/or H‐atom LBH cross sections. In turn, FUV auroral remote‐sensing algorithms must explicitly address both electron and proton aurora.
As our civilization becomes more dependent on space based technolo gies, we become more vulnerable to conditions in space weather. Accurate space weather specification and forecasting require proper modeling which account for the coupling between the sun, the magnetosphere, the thermo sphere, the ionosphere and the mesosphere. In spite of the tremendous advances that have been made in understanding the physics behind differ ent space weather phenomena, the ability to specify or predict space weather is limited due to the lack of continuous and extensive observations in these regions. Placing a constellation of GPS receivers in low-Earth orbit, such as the Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate (COSMIC), provides an extremely powerful system for continu ously and extensively measuring one of these regions, the ionosphere. COS MIC, by use of GPS occultations, will make it possible to obtain continuous and global 3-dimensional images of electron density, irregularities and TIDs in the ionosphere and plasmasphere. COSMIC would provide nearly 5600 globally distributed occultations per day suitable for ionospheric sensing. Occultations can be processed individually to obtain vertical profiles of elec tron density, with vertical resolution of-lkm, or collectively by means of tomography or data assimilation to obtain 3-D images of electron density or irregularity structure. In this paper we describe the GPS observables for ionospheric sensing and the occultation geometry. Our presentation evolves from discussing simple to more complicated inversion techniques starting with the Abel inversion, gradient-constrained Abel inversion, to mography, and finally data assimilation. In each of these techniques, the accuracy is assessed either via examination of real data from GPS/MET or
The joint Taiwan-United States FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC (Constellation Observing System for Meteorology, Ionosphere, and Climate) mission, hereafter called COSMIC, is the first satellite constellation dedicated to remotely sense Earth's atmosphere and ionosphere using a technique called Global Positioning System (GPS) radio occultation (RO). The occultations yield abundant information about neutral atmospheric temperature and moisture as well as space weather estimates of slant total electron content, electron density profiles, and an amplitude scintillation index, S4. With the success of COSMIC, the United States and Taiwan are moving forward with a follow-on RO mission named FORMOSAT-7/COSMIC-2 (COSMIC-2), which will ultimately place 12 satellites in orbit with two launches in 2016 and 2019. COSMIC-2 satellites will carry an advanced Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) RO receiver that will track both GPS and Russian Global Navigation Satellite System signals, with capability for eventually tracking other GNSS signals from the Chinese BeiDou and European Galileo system, as well as secondary space weather payloads to measure low-latitude plasma drifts and scintillation at multiple frequencies. COSMIC-2 will provide 4–6 times (10–15X in the low latitudes) the number of atmospheric and ionospheric observations that were tracked with COSMIC and will also improve the quality of the observations. In this article we focus on COSMIC/COSMIC-2 measurements of key ionospheric parameters.
We present the Radio Occultation Scintillation Simulator (ROSS), which uses the multiple phase screen method (MPS) to simulate the forward scatter of radio waves by irregularities in the equatorial ionosphere during radio occultation experiments. ROSS simulates propagation through equatorial plasma bubbles which are modeled as homogeneous electron density fluctuations modulated by a Chapman profile in altitude and a Gaussian window in the magnetic east‐west direction. We adjust the parameters of the density model using electron density profiles derived from the ALTAIR incoherent scatter radar (9.4°N, 167.5°E, 4.3° north dip), and space‐to‐ground observations of scintillation using VHF and GPS receivers that are colocated with the radar. We compare the simulated occultation scintillation to observations of scintillation from the CORISS instrument onboard the C/NOFS satellite during a radio occultation occurring near ALTAIR on 21 April 2009. The ratio of MPS predicted S4 to CORISS observed S4 throughout the F region altitudes of 240–350 km ranged between 0.86 and 1.14.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.