Usaha tambak udang merupakan usaha yang sangat menjanjikan saat ini. Masyarakat di Indonesia sangat menyukai hewan laut satu ini untuk dijadikan olahan makanan. Dengan banyaknya masyarakat indonesia yang menyukai udang dan pastinya penjualan udang sangat menjanjikan membuat sering terjadinya pencurian dan kecurangan dalam membudidayakan tambak udang. Penggunaan kamera CCTV (Closed-Circuit Television) merupakan salah satu alternatif yang digunakan untuk memantau wilayah tambak udang. Perkembangan teknologi saat ini pada CCTV dapat melakukan pengenalan aktivitas maupun manusia serta dapat mengenali yang tertangkap oleh kamera. Proses pengenalan aktivitas dan manusia ini dilakukan dengan melihat kemiripan objek maupun aktivitas yang ingin dilakukan deteksi. Sebelum proses ini terjadi sistem melakukan analisis, deteksi dan tracking pada objek dengan menghasilkan dataset yang akan diolah menggunakan CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) yang dibantu dengan algoritma YOLO versi 8. Hasil yang didapatkan berupa label dan juga garis objek yang berhasil dideteksi. Pada proses pengenalan objek manusia didapatkan rata-rata nilai akurasi yang didapatkan dari proses deteksi manusia sebesar 80,8%. Pada pengenalan aktivitas didapatkan rata-rata akurasi aktivitas berjalan sebesar 94.25%, aktivitas berlari sebesar 75%, aktivitas jongkok sebesar 92,5%, dan aktivitas duduk sebesar 80%, sedangkan pada pengenalan objek khusus seperti petugas keamanan didapatkan akurasi sebesar 96,7%.

The criminal law policy based on Article 4 of Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes regulates the return of state financial losses does not eliminate criminals, but the implementation of the provisions of Article 4 has not been implemented as appropriate. In practice there are irregularities in which the return of relatively small amounts of state losses can be stopped from investigation and eliminate the criminals of corruption. Moreover, the return of state financial losses was not a consideration for the Judge to commute the sentence to be imposed on the defendant. Therefore, in this study, it is necessary to study to evaluate the Legal Policy on punishment of perpetrators of corruption crimes who have returned state financial losses based on the provisions of Article 4 of Law No. 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes and analyze the Renewal of the Law on the punishment of perpetrators of corruption crimes that have returned state financial losses from a justice perspective. The purpose of this study is to find out the appropriate Criminal Law Policy against perpetrators of corruption crimes that return state financial losses from the perspective of justice for the future. This type of research method is legal research with a normative juridical approach that focuses on synchronizing laws, principles and legal doctrines. The data studied are library materials or secondary data, and tertiary legal materials, then discussed and presented descriptively. Forms of criminal law reform that can be applied to perpetrators of corruption crimes that have returned state financial losses in the future from the perspective of justice include: Renewal of the formulation of criminal threats that are cumulative imperative changed to cumulative and renewal of the regulation of the main types of crimes in the form of social work crimes that can be an alternative to imprisonment and an alternative to fines and formulation of the plea concept  bargaining as a procedural law for corruption and the formulation of the concept of restorative justice in the criminal act of corruption in the form of culpa or negligence.

Good law is law that is in accordance with the law that lives in society, which of course is also appropriate or is a reflection of the values that apply in society. The dimension of local wisdom of customary law which is based on cosmic, magical and religious thoughts is correlated with the sociological aspect of the perspective and culture of the Indonesian people. One of the indigenous peoples in Riau is the Kunto Darussalam traditional community in Rokan Hulum Regency. Settlement of ulayat land disputes is still used in marital dispute resolution, in consideration of adat law of tribal mamak, juvenile settlement, and settlement of ulayat land disputes. Keywords: Settlement, Customary Dispute, Kunto Darussalam. AbstrakHukum yang baik adalah hukum yang sesuai dengan hukum yang hidup (the living law) dalam masyarakat, yang tentu sesuai pula atau merupakan pencerminan dari nilai-nilai yang berlaku dalam masyarakat. Dimensi kearifan lokal hukum adat yang berlandaskan alam pikiran kosmis, magis dan religius ini berkorelasi dengan aspek sosiologis dari cara pandang dan budaya masyarakat Indonesia.Salah satu masyarakat adat di Riau yang masis eksis adalah masyarkat adat kunto Darussalam di Kabupaten rokan Hulum. Hukum adat yang masih digunakan dalam penyelesaian sengketa dalam perkawinan, dalam pengangkatan datuk/ninik mamak suku, penyelesian kenakalan remaja, dan penyelesian sengketa tanah ulayat. Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian, Sengketa Adat, Kunto Darussalam.

For Maintaining Criminal Law criminal law required materialistic Formal, which is set in the Criminal Code. Prior to the release of Criminal Law and the position of Special Duties / Authority Police Investigator is a single investigator, and investigator investigators should coordinate with the Police Investigator, whereas after the development of offense-offense out of the Criminal Code (Special Narcotics Law and Law on Corruption Eradication), Police investigator is no longer a single investigator, but can be done by the police, investigators, and BNN. BNN Domiciled in Narcotics Case Coordinator among other investigators with extraordinary powers when compared to the authority of the police investigator in the Criminal Procedure Code and Police Act. Similarly, the discharge of Law Number 31 Year 1999 Jo Law Number 20 Year 2001 on Combating Corruption, the investigation is authorized to exercise police investigator, prosecutor and investigator KPK investigators. Police investigators located under KPK investigators, as coordinator, monitoring, supervision of other investigators with extraordinary powers when compared to the appropriate authority of the police investigators and the Criminal Procedure Police Act.

The Criminal Procedure Code regulates Police Investigators as the main investigators and investigators of civil servants in coordination umbrella with Police Investigators. The development of laws outside the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code regulates several Investigative Institutions (Police Investigators, Civil Service Investigators, Prosecutor Investigators, Corruption Eradication Commission Investigators, National Narcotics Agency Investigators, and Investigators of Financial Services Authorities). Differences in top management, as well as differences in authority and work in investigations, have led to conflicts between the Investigating Institutions, which have an effect on the achievement of the objectives of the integrated criminal justice system. In reality, the Investigative Institution consists of Police Investigators, Civil Service Investigators, Prosecutor Investigators, Corruption Eradication Commission Investigators, National Narcotics Agency Investigators, and Investigators of Financial Services Authorities. Each investigator has different top officials (Chief of Police, Attorney General, Minister of Law and Human Rights, Commander of the Indonesian National Army, Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission and Chairman of the National Narcotics Agency) and has different authority and conduct in conducting Investigations. Reconstruction of authority among the Investigating Institutions, conducted with Interpretation and Dialogue together which gave rise to new construction Pancasila Investigation Legal System.