This study aims to explain the position of minority shareholders as interested parties and the legal protection against them from the merger of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesian Laws and Regulations. Merger is a restructuring that is often carried out to improve company performance, therefore there is a need for legal protection for minority shareholders because their position with the principle of one share one vote in decision making on mergers in the GMS is weaker than the majority shareholders Minority shareholders who do not agree with the merger are given the right to sell their shares at a fair price but do not stop the merger process. The method used in this research is normative juridical. The approach used in this research is a statutory approach, namely research that prioritizes legal materials in the form of statutory regulations as a basic reference for conducting research. From the results of the study, it is known that the position of minority shareholders is weaker than the majority in the RUPS, due to the number of share ownership. minority shareholders who do not agree with the merger will be granted an appraisal right, namely the right to sell their shares at a fair price in Article 126 paragraph (2). However, the merger process is still ongoing, which shows that legal remedies by minority shareholders cannot stop the merger process. So that the Company Law has not been able to provide clear legal protection to accommodate the rights and interests of minority shareholders who were disadvantaged in the merger process as required in the principles of Good Corporate Governance (GCG). It is advisable to revise or add to the Company Law in terms of the merger of the Company to be better able to accommodate the rights and interests of minority shareholders towards the merger due to the position of minority shareholders who are still difficult to exercise their rights and interests in the merger, especially in closed companies, to encourage the application of GCG principles so as to guarantee justice and legal certainty for minority shareholders

The implementation of corporate responsibility by PT. Perkebunan Nusantara I Langsa ithe form of partnership and community development programs by observing Law Number 40 year 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies, Government Regulation Numer 47 year 2012 and strengthened by Ministerial Regulation Number PER-02/MBU/7/2017 concerning the Partnership and Community. Which cannot be denied that the positive impact on the community and environment, specifically in terms of granting capital loans as venture capital for fostered partners in Gampong Alue Dua. in the case of granting capital loasn, a legal relationship arises, namely rights and obligations between the company and the fostered partners considers that the venture capital fund is a grant from the campany.The purpose of this study is to find out and explain the implementation of corporate responsibility to the community and the environment, and explain the implementation constraints and efforts to resolve the implementation of corporate responsibility.This research in an empirical juridical legal research, with qualitative legal research types, the source of legal material used is primary and secondary legal materials, research collection techniques are carried ou by interview and literature study methods, research analysis is done by descriptive analysis.Based on the results of research that PT. Perkebunan Nusantara I Langsa has implemented corporate social resposibilty in the from of the Partnership and Community Development Program. The constraints and resolution efforts faced by PT Perkebunan Nusantara I Langsa in the implementation of corporate social responsibility are divided into two, namely in the Partnership Program, the obstacles include: difficulty finding loan data, no confiscation seizure, wrong perception from the community, The Community Development Program has problems, namely difficulties in place surveys, The solution is a persuasive approach.It is recommended to the company in the partnership program the need for a detailed explanation in the nechanism to be followed by the fostered partners from various stages so that the company has no difficulty in billing the fostered partners, and the company can balance petigas with the company's work area so that it is easy to conduct surveys or the didtribution of aid funds right on target.

Prinsip tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan perusahaan diatur dalam Pasal 74 Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Berdasarkan ketentuan tersebut perusahaan berkewajiban untuk melaksanakan CSR, namun dalam kenyataannya masih ada beberapa perusahaan yang mengabaikan dan belum sepenuhnya melaksanakan CSR. Salah satunya PT. Perkebunan Nusantara II Kebun Kwala Sawit yang belum dapat melaksanakan CSR secara benar, hal ini akan menimbulkan dampak negatif terhadap lingkungan yang dikhawatirkan akan mencemari lingkungan serta menghambat aktivitas masyarakat di kemudian hari. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian pelaksanaan tanggung jawab perusahaan terhadap lingkungan dilakukan dengan cara pengolaan kembali terhadap limbah dan pemantauan setiap satu bulan sekali serta melakukan kunjungan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat yang bertujuan agar hubungan masyarakat dengan perusahaan tetap terjalin dengan baik, hambatan dalam pelaksanaan tanggung jawab sosial perusahaan yaitu adanya kecemburuan di kalangan masyarakat terhadap penduduk yang diterima sebagai tenaga kerja di perusahaan, adapun upaya yang dilakukan oleh pihak perusahaan yaitu dengan pemanfaatan kembali limbah yang dihasilkan serta memberikan bantuan berupa beasiswa, pembangunan sekolah, dan pemberian bahan pangan berupa beras.

No abstract

Perkawinan beda agama masih ditemukan di Indonesia dengan cara meminta penetapan pengadilan, sebagaimana dalam Putusan No. 622/Pdt.P/2018/ PN.Mks. dengan alasan bahwa para pemohon merasa bertanggung jawab terhadap anak yang lahir di luar perkawinan. Meskipun perkawinan beda agama telah mendapatkan izin Pengadilan Negeri serta telah diakui negara, namun perkawinan tersebut menyalahi aturan hukum sebagaimana pada Pasal 2 ayat (1) UU No. 1 tahun 1974 serta Pasal 40 huruf c dan Pasal 44 Kompilasi Hukum Islam. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun perkawinan beda agama telah mendapat izin pengadilan dan dicatatkan pada KCS, namun, persoalan ini belum jelas dari segi kepastian hukum terhadap anak dan cenderung menimbulkan permasalahan yang berkepanjangan terhadap anak, seperti status keabsahan sang anak yang dianggap sebagai anak yang tidak sah, kemudian pada kewajiban orang tua, hak waris, wali nikah serta pendidikan anak.