We present an assessment of a multi-method approach based on ion beam analysis to obtain highresolution depth profiles of the total chemical composition of complex alloy systems. As a model system we employ an alloy based on several transition metals and containing light species. Samples have been investigated by a number of different ion-beam based techniques, i.e., Rutherford Backscattering Spectrometry, Particle-Induced X-ray Emission, Elastic Backscattering Spectrometry and Time-of-Flight/Energy Elastic Recoil Detection Analysis. Sets of spectra obtained from these different techniques were analyzed both independently and following an iterative and self-consistent approach yielding a more accurate depth profile of the sample, including both metallic heavy constituents (Cr, Fe and Ni) as well as the rather reactive light species (C, O) in the alloy. A quantitative comparison in terms of achievable precision and accuracy is made and the limitations of the single method approach are discussed for the different techniques. The multi-method approach is shown to yield significantly improved and accurate information on stoichiometry, depth distribution, and thickness of the alloy with the improvements being decisive for a detailed correlation of composition to the material properties such as corrosion strength. The study also shows the increased relative importance of experimental statistics for the achievable accuracy in the multi-method approach.
We present experiments demonstrating trajectory-dependent electronic excitations at low ion velocities, where ions are expected to primarily interact with delocalized valence electrons. The energy loss of H
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.