Various countries in the world today are threatened by money laundering as a transnational crime as know borderless crimes. This is because the impact of money laundering is not an ordinary impact. The crime of money laundering has a huge impact disrupt the stability of the economy and social life, and even damage the world economic order. However, various legal problems in dealing with money laundering often occur in Indonesia. With these various problems, it shows that Indonesia needs a legal reformulation related to money laundering as classified as a transnational crime. Based on this background, this research will be discuss the problems is how can money laundering be classified as a transnational crime and what are the problems with it’s law enforcement and how is legal policy of money laundering as transnational crimes reformulation in Indonesia. This study uses a descriptive normative research method with a qualitative approach. The results research show that the idea of reformulation in law enforcement of money laundering as a transnational crime in Indonesia is through the reconstruction of Mutual Legal Assistance or MLA between the Indonesian government and various countries in the world and the application of other international instruments, such as extradition and confiscation. Then regarding the problem of money laundering in law enforcement, it is necessary to reformulate the authority of Corruption Eradication Commission or KPK to prosecute money laundering crimes originating from the criminal act of corruption because the Anti-Money Laundering Law has not yet clearly regulated the law enforcers who are authorized to carry out prosecutions for the Crime of Money Laundering. So to overcome this law enforcement problem, it is necessary to reform the money laundering law.

Modern biotechnology products have provided considerable benefits for improving human life and well-being, both in the agriculture, food, industry and human health sectors, as well as in the environmental field. But there are concerns that modern biotechnology products, in addition to providing benefits, also have risks that have adverse impacts on the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity and human health. Therefore, steps need to be taken, both legally, administratively, and technology to ensure the level of biological safety.This study aims to explain and analyze the safety of Genetically Modified Organism or GMO according to international law and their implementation in Indonesia. The problem approach used in this research is normative law (library research). The data used are secondary data obtained from international, national legal regulations and literature data related to material that supports discussion of the problem. Analysis of the data used is descriptive qualitative.The results of research on food safety of Genetically Modified Organism or GMO according to international law, are regulations on food safety of genetically engineered products regulated in the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. The laws and regulations governing GMO food in Indonesia are good enough because they have carried out the mandate and did not deviate from the biodiversity convention and Cartagena protocol by passing legislation regulations from the legal level to the decision level of the head of BPOM. It’s just that for rules regarding GMO food that is sold in retail, or that is not in the form of packaging, there is still no technical rules that can answer the problems in the field.

Practically, corruption is an extraordinary crime, because the impact of corruption harmed the financial condition of a country, corruption are also alleged violated the social and economic rights of the community or citizens in the country. As a criminal act which included as an extraordinary crime, so an extraordinary method also needs to be applied in eradicating corruption. For this reason, an huge steps are needed to provide a deterrent effect to perpetrators of corruption. Punishment to corruption perpetrators is expected to provide a deterrent effect. One of that steps is to return the state losses which caused by corruption perpetrators, as well as being one of the anticipatory steps so that later people will not dare to commit corruption. This research was made with the aim to answer how to recover assets from corruption and to find out how the role of the prosecutor's office in efforts to recover assets from corruption crimes. In this research, the author uses normative legal research method, namely research that conducts an inventory of the applicable laws and regulations. The results of research regarding efforts to recover assets can be carried out through criminal and civil legal remedies. Furthermore, the role of the Prosecutor's Office as a law enforcement officer in charge of law enforcement regarding the assets recovery through criminal acts recognizes two mechanisms or procedures for recovery assets, the first mechanism or procedure is the seizure of assets without punishment, and the second is the mechanism or procedure for voluntary asset return. The steps that can be carried out in assets recovery are divided into several steps including the asset tracking steps, blocking or freezing steps, foreclosure, confiscation and return.

The reality of state life places the environment in sustainable development as an integral part of the national dynamics development. Moreover, Indonesia itself has issued various policies and instruments in the development of environmental law. Therefore, the development of environmental law cannot be separated from efforts to develop environmental law in accordance with international and national concepts or principles, one of which is the concept of sustainable development. However, environmental problems in Indonesia often occur, for example, forest fires, river pollution, air pollution, garbage, etc. This can raise doubts for the Indonesian people regarding the concept of sustainable development has really been applied in environmental law regulations in Indonesia so that it is necessary to examine the application of the sustainable development concept in Indonesia’s environmental law. Based on this background, the problem discussed in this paper is how the concept and application of sustainable development are in Indonesia’s environmental law? The method used in this article is normative legal research with a library law approach. The results of the study indicate that environmental law regulations in Indonesia such as: Law Number 4 of 1982 concerning Basic Provisions for Environmental Management, Law Number 23 of 1997 concerning Environmental Management, Law no. 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management, and Law no. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, has been in accordance with the concept of sustainable development as stated in the articles in each of these laws.