No abstract

We used NDIR for this measurement (Siemens, Ultramat 6E). Configuration of analysis system: gas cylinder-> regulator-> MFC-> NDIR-> response comparison-> results Sample cell flow: 800 mL/min, Reference cell flow: 800 mL/min Cell pressure: 1.94 Kg/cm 3 Calibration Standards: The calibration standards for CCQM-K52 were prepared by gravimetric method including 0.93 %mol/mol of Ar in KRISS. Therefore, the matrix is different from that of coordinating Lab., which does not contain Ar. All source gases were analyzed impurities for purity analysis. The primary standards with 0.014% overall uncertainty (k=2) are used.

There is a high international priority attached to activities which reduce NOx in the atmosphere. The current level of permitted emissions is typically between 50 µmol/mol and 100 µmol/mol, but lower values are expected in the future. Currently, ambient air quality monitoring regulations also require the measurement of NOx mole fractions as low as 0.2 µmol/mol. The production of accurate standards at these levels of mole fractions requires either dilution of a stable higher concentration gas standard or production by a dynamic technique, for example one based on permeation tubes.The CCQM-K74 key comparison was designed to evaluate the level of comparability of National Metrology Institutes' measurement capabilities and standards for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) at a nominal mole fraction of 10 µmol/mol.The measurements of this key comparison took place from June 2009 to May 2010.Seventeen laboratories took part in this comparison coordinated by the BIPM and VSL. The key comparison reference value was based on BIPM measurement results, and the standard measurement uncertainty of the reference value was 0.042 µmol/mol.This key comparison demonstrated that the results of the majority of the participants agreed within limits of ±3% relative to the reference value. The results of only one laboratory lay significantly outside these limits. Likewise this comparison made clear that a full interpretation of the results of the comparison needed to take into account the presence of nitric acid (in the range 100 nmol/mol to 350 nmol/mol) in the cylinders circulated as part of the comparison, as well as the possible presence of nitric acid in the primary standards used by participating laboratories.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is one of six greenhouse gases that are regulated by the Kyoto Protocol and has a Global Warming Potential (GWP) that is 296 times that of carbon dioxide. Global levels of nitrous oxide have increased at a rate of 0.25%/yr (0.8 ppb/yr) during the last ten years. In order to monitor levels of nitrous oxide in the atmosphere, it is necessary to use measurement standards with demonstrated equivalence at the highest level of accuracy.This report describes the results of a key comparison of standard gas mixtures of nitrous oxide in synthetic air at an amount fraction of 320 nmol/mol. This key comparison is part of the programme of the Gas Analysis Working Group (GAWG) of the CCQM to demonstrate the equivalence of the standards and measurement capabilities of the NMIs for greenhouse gases. It will support the development of measurement capability at the NMIs for nitrous oxide with uncertainties within the target set by the Global Atmospheric Watch (GAW) programme of the WMO for its global monitoring networks.Main text. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report. Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database kcdb.bipm.org/.The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCQM, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MRA).

Procedures developed for accurate measurement of amount of substance ratios for gas isotopes, as used to improve our knowledge of the Avogadro constant and checked for quantitative conformity against kinetic gas theory, were used to measure synthetic mixtures of enriched xenon gas isotopes, prepared by (micro)-gravimetry as is usual in the preparation of synthetic gas compound mixtures. This allowed a totally independent evaluation, on the same samples, of the relative combined standard uncertainty of (a) the procedure to perform direct measurements of amount of substance ratios of gas isotopes in the redetermination of the Avogadro constant and (b) the gravimetric preparation procedure. The results of both procedures, mass spectrometry and gravimetry, agree to a relative uncertainty of 2 × 10-3 for amount measurements of the major abundant isotopes. Thus it seems that a direct measurement of isotopic gas mixtures (e.g. of natural isotopic composition) is now possible for xenon isotopes- and probably also for other gaseous isotopes- without necessarily having to rely on ''calibration'' by means of values provided by measurements of gravimetrically prepared isotope mixtures. However, synthetic mixtures may be needed for validation and verification purposes, in particular for quality assurance (QA).